ArticleThe Laryngoscope2010
Laser stimulation of single auditory nerve fibers.
Article in The Laryngoscope, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acoustic and optoacoustic stimulations in auditory brainstem response test in salicylate induced tinnitus.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Response of a neuronal network computational model to infrared neural stimulation.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2022Article
- Near-infrared stimulation of the auditory nerve: A decade of progress toward an optical cochlear implant.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2021Review
- Photons detected in the active nerve by photographic technique.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Responses of Primary Afferent Fibers to Acupuncture-Like Peripheral Stimulation at Different Frequencies: Characterization by Single-Unit Recording in Rats.Neuroscience bulletin · 2020Article
- Novel Approaches of Nanoceria with Magnetic, Photoluminescent, and Gas-Sensing Properties.ACS omega · 2020Article
- Efferent Inputs Are Required for Normal Function of Vestibular Nerve Afferents.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019Article
- Nanoparticle-based Plasmonic Transduction for Modulation of Electrically Excitable Cells.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Effect of shorter pulse duration in cochlear neural activation with an 810-nm near-infrared laser.Lasers in medical science · 2017Article
- Article
- Simultaneous bilateral laser therapy accelerates recovery after noise-induced hearing loss in a rat model.PeerJ · 2016Article
- On the Horizon: Cochlear Implant Technology.Otolaryngologic clinics of North America · 2015Review
- Pulsed 980 nm short wavelength infrared neural stimulation in cochlea and laser parameter effects on auditory response characteristics.Biomedical engineering online · 2015Article
- Radiant energy required for infrared neural stimulation.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Temporal properties of inferior colliculus neurons to photonic stimulation in the cochlea.Physiological reports · 2015Article
- Attenuated infrared neuron stimulation response in cochlea of deaf animals may associate with the degeneration of spiral ganglion neurons.Biomedical optics express · 2015Article
- Target structures for cochlear infrared neural stimulation.Neurophotonics · 2015Article
- Article
- Novel interfaces for light directed neuronal stimulation: advances and challenges.International journal of nanomedicine · 2014Review
- Whole cell patch clamp for investigating the mechanisms of infrared neural stimulation.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectives/hypothesisOne limitation with cochlear implants is the difficulty stimulating spatially discrete spiral ganglion cell groups because of electrode interactions. Multipolar electrodes have improved on this some, but also at the cost of much higher device power consumption. Recently, it has been shown that spatially selective stimulation of the auditory nerve is possible with a mid-infrared laser aimed at the spiral ganglion via the round window. However, these neurons must be driven at adequate rates for optical radiation to be useful in cochlear implants. We herein use single-fiber recordings to characterize the responses of auditory neurons to optical radiation. STUDY
designIn vivo study using normal-hearing adult gerbils.
methodsTwo diode lasers were used for stimulation of the auditory nerve. They operated between 1.844 μm and 1.873 μm, with pulse durations of 35 μs to 1,000 μs, and at repetition rates up to 1,000 pulses per second (pps). The laser outputs were coupled to a 200-μm-diameter optical fiber placed against the round window membrane and oriented toward the spiral ganglion. The auditory nerve was exposed through a craniotomy, and recordings were taken from single fibers during acoustic and laser stimulation.
resultsAction potentials occurred 2.5 ms to 4.0 ms after the laser pulse. The latency jitter was up to 3 ms. Maximum rates of discharge averaged 97 ± 52.5 action potentials per second. The neurons did not strictly respond to the laser at stimulation rates over 100 pps.
conclusionsAuditory neurons can be stimulated by a laser beam passing through the round window membrane and driven at rates sufficient for useful auditory information. Optical stimulation and electrical stimulation have different characteristics; which could be selectively exploited in future cochlear implants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.