Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20830287›Full record

ArticlePloS one2010

Is IP-10 an accurate marker for detecting M. tuberculosis-specific response in HIV-infected persons?

Delia Goletti, Alamelu Raja, Basirudeen Syed Ahamed Kabeer, Camilla Rodrigues, Archana Sodha, Stefania Carrara, Guy Vernet, Christophe Longuet, Giuseppe Ippolito, Satheesh Thangaraj and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Evaluation of theFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Diagnostic accuracy of interferon gamma-induced protein 10 for tuberculosis: a meta-analysis.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2014
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Delia GolettiTranslational Research Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Preclinical Research, Lazzaro Spallanzani National Institute for Infectious Diseases (INMI), Rome, Italy. delia.goletti@inmi.it
Alamelu Raja
Basirudeen Syed Ahamed Kabeer
Camilla Rodrigues
Archana Sodha
Stefania Carrara
Guy Vernet
Christophe Longuet
Giuseppe Ippolito
Satheesh Thangaraj
Marc Leportier
Enrico Girardi
Philippe Henri Lagrange
Fondation Mérieux · FRIstituto Nazionale per le Malattie Infettive Lazzaro Spallanzani · ITNational Institute of Research in Tuberculosis · INP. D. Hinduja Hospital and Medical Research Centre · INHôpital Saint-Louis · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe suboptimal sensitivity of Interferon (IFN)-γ-based in-vitro assays, especially in immunocompromised individuals, emphasizes the need for alternative markers for diagnosing tuberculosis (TB). The objective of this study was to evaluate whether interferon-inducible protein (IP)-10, monocyte chemotactic protein (MCP)-2 and interleukin (IL)-2 can be useful biomarkers for evaluating a specific response to RD1 antigens associated to active TB disease in HIV-infected individuals. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsThe study was carried out in India, the country with the highest TB burden in the world. Sixty-six HIV-infected individuals were prospectively enrolled, 28 with active-pulmonary-TB and 38 without. The whole blood assay based on RD1-selected peptides (experimental test) and QuantiFERON-TB Gold In tube (QFT-IT) was performed. Plasma was harvested at day-1-post-culture and soluble factors were evaluated by ELISA. The results indicate that by detecting IP-10, the sensitivity of the experimental test and QFT-antigen (75% and 85.7% respectively) for active TB was higher compared to the same assays based on IFN-γ (42.9% and 60.7% respectively) and was not influenced by the ability to respond to the mitogen. By detecting IP-10, the specificity of the experimental test and QFT-antigen (57.9% and 13.2% respectively) for active TB was lower than what was reported for the same assays using IFN-γ-detection (78.9% and 68.4% respectively). On the other side, in vitro IL-2 and MCP-2 responses were not significantly associated with active TB.

conclusionsHIV infection does not impair RD1-specific response detected by IP-10, while it significantly decreases IFN-γ-mediated responses. At the moment it is unclear whether higher detection is related to higher sensitivity or lower specificity of the assay. Further studies in high and low TB endemic countries are needed to elucidate this.

Indexed as

AdultAIDS-Related Opportunistic InfectionsBiomarkersChemokine CCL8Chemokine CXCL10Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHumansInterleukin-2MaleProspective StudiesTuberculosisBiomarkersChemokine CCL8Chemokine CXCL10Interleukin-2

Identifiers

PMID20830287
PMCPMC2935361
OpenAlexW2039873011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.