Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20829787›Full record

ReviewNature2010

Functional roles for noise in genetic circuits.

Avigdor Eldar, Michael B Elowitz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 659 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
659citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

659 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Modified frequency-based sensitivity analysis for oscillatory system models.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Organelle partitioning in the multi-budding yeastbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Feedback Control and Sensitivity Analysis in Synthetic Gene Circuits.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

599 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Avigdor EldarHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Caltech M/C 114-96, 1200 East California Boulevard, Pasadena, California 91125, USA.
Michael B Elowitz

Funding

THEORETICAL ANALYSIS OF FUNCTIONAL MODULESP50GM068763 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI BARKAI, NAAMA · 2003 to 2012
$28.9M
Stochastic Pulsing in Microbial Regulation and DifferentiationR01GM079771 · NIGMS · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI ELOWITZ, MICHAEL B · 2007 to 2015
$2.8M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM068763NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM079771NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM079771
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genetic circuits that regulate cellular functions are subject to stochastic fluctuations, or 'noise', in the levels of their components. Noise, far from just a nuisance, has begun to be appreciated for its essential role in key cellular activities. Noise functions in both microbial and eukaryotic cells, in multicellular development, and in evolution. It enables coordination of gene expression across large regulons, as well as probabilistic differentiation strategies that function across cell populations. At the longest timescales, noise may facilitate evolutionary transitions. Here we review examples and emerging principles that connect noise, the architecture of the gene circuits in which it is present, and the biological functions it enables. We further indicate some of the important challenges and opportunities going forward.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationGene Regulatory NetworksAnimalsCell Physiological PhenomenaHumansModels, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID20829787
PMCPMC4100692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.