ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2010
The generating function of CID, ETD, and CID/ETD pairs of tandem mass spectra: applications to database search.
Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 109 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
109 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Review of Protein Inference.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Review
- Systematic exploration of dynamic splicing networks reveals conserved multistage regulators of neurogenesis.Molecular cell · 2022Article
- Dataset containing physiological amounts of spike-in proteins into murine C2C12 background as a ground truth quantitative LC-MS/MS reference.Data in brief · 2022Article
- Characterization of peptide-protein relationships in protein ambiguity groups via bipartite graphs.PloS one · 2022Article
- Endofin is required for HD-PTP and ESCRT-0 interdependent endosomal sorting of ubiquitinated transmembrane cargoes.iScience · 2021Article
- DIAmeter: matching peptides to data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
- Enhancing Open Modification Searches via a Combined Approach Facilitated by Ursgal.Journal of proteome research · 2021Article
- Proteome Discoverer-A Community Enhanced Data Processing Suite for Protein Informatics.Proteomes · 2021Review
- Protein context shapes the specificity of SH3 domain-mediated interactions in vivo.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Proteoform Identification by Combining RNA-Seq and Top-Down Mass Spectrometry.Journal of proteome research · 2021Article
- Systematic Discovery of Short Linear Motifs Decodes Calcineurin Phosphatase Signaling.Molecular cell · 2020Article
- Use of Multiple Ion Fragmentation Methods to Identify Protein Cross-Links and Facilitate Comparison of Data Interpretation Algorithms.Journal of proteome research · 2020Article
- The Skyline ecosystem: Informatics for quantitative mass spectrometry proteomics.Mass spectrometry reviews · 2020Review
- Short-Term Stable Isotope Probing of Proteins Reveals Taxa Incorporating Inorganic Carbon in a Hot Spring Microbial Mat.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2020Article
- Reproducibility, Specificity and Accuracy of Relative Quantification Using Spectral Library-based Data-independent Acquisition.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2020Article
- Evolution and regulation of nitrogen flux through compartmentalized metabolic networks in a marine diatom.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Chemical Derivatization of Affinity Matrices Provides Protection from Tryptic Proteolysis.Journal of proteome research · 2019Article
- IsoProt: A Complete and Reproducible Workflow To Analyze iTRAQ/TMT Experiments.Journal of proteome research · 2019Article
- A Markov Chain Monte Carlo Method for Estimating the Statistical Significance of Proteoform Identifications by Top-Down Mass Spectrometry.Journal of proteome research · 2019Article
- Interactome Rewiring Following Pharmacological Targeting of BET Bromodomains.Molecular cell · 2019Article
49 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent emergence of new mass spectrometry techniques (e.g. electron transfer dissociation, ETD) and improved availability of additional proteases (e.g. Lys-N) for protein digestion in high-throughput experiments raised the challenge of designing new algorithms for interpreting the resulting new types of tandem mass (MS/MS) spectra. Traditional MS/MS database search algorithms such as SEQUEST and Mascot were originally designed for collision induced dissociation (CID) of tryptic peptides and are largely based on expert knowledge about fragmentation of tryptic peptides (rather than machine learning techniques) to design CID-specific scoring functions. As a result, the performance of these algorithms is suboptimal for new mass spectrometry technologies or nontryptic peptides. We recently proposed the generating function approach (MS-GF) for CID spectra of tryptic peptides. In this study, we extend MS-GF to automatically derive scoring parameters from a set of annotated MS/MS spectra of any type (e.g. CID, ETD, etc.), and present a new database search tool MS-GFDB based on MS-GF. We show that MS-GFDB outperforms Mascot for ETD spectra or peptides digested with Lys-N. For example, in the case of ETD spectra, the number of tryptic and Lys-N peptides identified by MS-GFDB increased by a factor of 2.7 and 2.6 as compared with Mascot. Moreover, even following a decade of Mascot developments for analyzing CID spectra of tryptic peptides, MS-GFDB (that is not particularly tailored for CID spectra or tryptic peptides) resulted in 28% increase over Mascot in the number of peptide identifications. Finally, we propose a statistical framework for analyzing multiple spectra from the same precursor (e.g. CID/ETD spectral pairs) and assigning p values to peptide-spectrum-spectrum matches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.