Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20829330›Full record

ReviewClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2010

New strategies in ovarian cancer: uptake and experience of women at high risk of ovarian cancer who are considering risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy.

Suzanne M Miller, Pagona Roussi, Mary B Daly, John Scarpato

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Suzanne M MillerPsychosocial and Biobehavioral Medicine Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Cheltenham, Pennsylvania 19012, USA. suzanne.miller@fccc.edu
Pagona Roussi
Mary B Daly
John Scarpato

Funding

WORD PROCESSING CENTER--COREP30CA006927 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI Dietmar J Kappes · 1985 to 2026
$138.8M
USING TAILORED MESSAGE TO INCREASE COLORECTAL SCREENINGP01CA057586 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI MARCUS, ALFRED C · 1993 to 2010
$10.5M
Facilitating Follow-up Adherence for Abnormal Pap SmearsR01CA104979 · NCI · FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER · PI MILLER, SUZANNE M · 2004 to 2008
$2.6M
Preventing Postpartum Smoking Relapse: A C-SHIP Based Text Messaging InterventionRC1CA145063 · NCI · FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER · PI MILLER, SUZANNE M · 2009 to 2010
$981k
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA057586NCI NIH HHS P01CA57586NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006927NCI NIH HHS R01 CA104979NCI NIH HHS RC1 CA145063NCI NIH HHS RC1 CA 145063-01NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG011766
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here, we review factors associated with uptake of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy by women at increased hereditary risk for ovarian cancer, as well as quality of life issues following surgery. Forty-one research studies identified through PubMed and PsychInfo met inclusion criteria. Older age, having had children, a family history of ovarian cancer, a personal history of breast cancer, prophylactic mastectomy, and BRCA1/2 mutation carrier status increase the likelihood of undergoing surgery. Psychosocial variables predictive of surgery uptake include greater perceived risk of ovarian cancer and cancer-related anxiety. Most women report satisfaction with their decision to undergo surgery and both lower perceived ovarian cancer risk and less cancer-related anxiety as benefits. Hormonal deprivation is the main disadvantage reported, particularly by premenopausal women who are not on hormonal replacement therapy (HRT). The evidence is mixed about satisfaction with the level of information provided prior to surgery, although generally, women report receiving insufficient information about the pros and cons of HRT. These findings indicate that when designing decision aids, demographic, medical history, and psychosocial variables need to be addressed in order to facilitate quality decision making.

Indexed as

Risk Reduction BehaviorCarcinomaChoice BehaviorDecision MakingFemaleHormone Replacement TherapyHumansMedical OncologyOvarian NeoplasmsOvariectomyPatient Education as TopicRisk FactorsSalpingostomy

Identifiers

PMID20829330
PMCPMC3107031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.