ArticleBiosensors & bioelectronics2010
Ultrasensitive mycotoxin detection by STING sensors.
Article in Biosensors & bioelectronics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding Sensitivity in Nanoscale Sensing Devices.ACS measurement science au · 2025Article
- Nanomaterial-based biosensors: a new frontier in plant pathogen detection and plant disease management.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Characterizing Prion-Like Protein Aggregation: Emerging Nanopore-Based Approaches.Small methods · 2024Review
- The Detection of Trace Metal Contaminants in Organic Products Using Ion Current Rectifying Quartz Nanopipettes.Analytical chemistry · 2024Article
- (Bio)nanotechnology in Food Science-Food Packaging.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Sensing with Nanopores and Aptamers: A Way Forward.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- An Overview of the Applications of Nanomaterials and Nanodevices in the Food Industry.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Bioinspired integrated nanosystems based on solid-state nanopores: "Chemical science · 2017Article
- Plant pathogen nanodiagnostic techniques: forthcoming changes?Biotechnology, biotechnological equipment · 2014Article
- Article
- Carbohydrate-actuated nanofluidic diode: switchable current rectification in a nanopipette.Nanoscale · 2013Article
- Article
- Article
- Stochastic sensing of proteins with receptor-modified solid-state nanopores.Nature nanotechnology · 2012Article
- Copper Sensing with a Prion Protein Modified Nanopipette.RSC advances · 2012Article
- Reversible cation response with a protein-modified nanopipette.Analytical chemistry · 2011Article
- Reversible thrombin detection by aptamer functionalized STING sensors.Biosensors & bioelectronics · 2011Article
- Voltage-controlled metal binding on polyelectrolyte-functionalized nanopores.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2011Article
- Dynamic control of nanoprecipitation in a nanopipette.ACS nano · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Signal transduction by ion nano-gating (STING) technology is a label-free biosensor capable of identifying DNA and proteins. Based on a functionalized quartz nanopipette, the STING sensor includes specific recognition elements for analyte discrimination based on size, shape and charge density. A key feature of this technology is that it does not require any nanofabrication facility; each nanopipette can be easily, reproducibly, and inexpensively fabricated and tailored at the bench, thus reducing the cost and the turnaround time. Here, we show that STING sensors are capable of the ultrasensitive detection of HT-2 toxin with a detection limit of 100 fg/ml and compare the STING capabilities with respect to conventional sandwich assay techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.