Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20828793›Full record

ArticleSeminars in arthritis and rheumatism2011

Health care utilization in patients with gout.

Jasvinder A Singh, A Sarkin, M Shieh, D Khanna, R Terkeltaub, S J Lee, A Kavanaugh, J D Hirsch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Inpatient gout: a review.Current rheumatology reports · 2014
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jasvinder A SinghBirmingham VA Medical Center and University of Alabama 35294, USA. Jasvinder.md@gmail.com
A Sarkin
M Shieh
D Khanna
R Terkeltaub
S J Lee
A Kavanaugh
J D Hirsch
University of California, San Diego · USVA San Diego Healthcare System · USBirmingham VA Medical Center · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

ZOVIRAX CREAM TO TREAT HERPES LABIALIS IN ADOLESCENTSM01RR000827 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ZELL, JASON · 1985 to 2010
$74.3M
Mayo Clinic Center for Translational Science ActivitiesKL2RR024151 · NCRR · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI RIZZA, ROBERT A. · 2006 to 2011
$15.3M
Health Values and Minimally Important Differences in Systemic SclerosisK23AR053858 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI KHANNA, DINESH · 2007 to 2011
$617k
NCRR NIH HHS 1 KL2 RR024151-01NCRR NIH HHS KL2 RR024151NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR000827NIAMS NIH HHS K23 AR053858NIAMS NIH HHS K23AR053858-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo study health care utilization patterns in patients with gout.

methodsIn a gout population from primary care and rheumatology clinics in 3 U.S. metropolitan cities, we collected data on gout-related utilization (primary care, rheumatology, urgent care, emergency room, and other) in the past year. We evaluated the association of comorbidities, age, gender, gout characteristics (time since last gout attack and tophi), and gout severity ratings (mean of serum uric acid, patient-rated, and physician-rated gout severity) and with emergency/urgent care and primary care utilization using regression and correlation analyses.

resultsOf the 296 patients who reported visiting at least 1 type of health practitioner for gout in the past year, the percentage of patients utilizing the service at least once and annual utilization rates among utilizers were as follows: primary care physician, 60%, 3.0 ± 3.4; nurse practitioner/physician assistant, 26%, 2.7 ± 2.5; rheumatologist, 51%, 3.7 ± 5.7; urgent care, 23%, 2.1 ± 2.2; emergency room, 20%, 2.0 ± 1.7; and hospitalization, 7%, 2.1 ± 1.4. Higher overall gout severity was associated with greater use of each resource type and with overall gout-related utilization. Nonemergency/nonurgent care utilization (primary care physician, nurse practitioner, physician's assistant, and rheumatologist for gout) was the strongest predictor of gout-related emergency/urgent care utilization. Patients with more comorbidities had greater gout-related primary care utilization.

conclusionsOverall gout severity was associated with all types of gout-related utilization. This may help to screen high utilizers for targeted behavioral and therapeutic interventions. Having a higher number of comorbid conditions was a risk factor for higher gout-related primary care utilization.

Indexed as

ComorbidityDelivery of Health CareFemaleGoutHealth PersonnelHumansMaleOutpatient Clinics, HospitalPrimary Health CareSeverity of Illness IndexUnited StatesUrban Health

Identifiers

PMID20828793
PMCPMC3026897
OpenAlexW1963764397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.