Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20828196›Full record

ArticleJournal of agricultural and food chemistry2010

Composition and fatty acid distribution of bovine milk phospholipids from processed milk products.

Sophie Gallier, Derek Gragson, Charles Cabral, Rafael Jiménez-Flores, David W Everett

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 143 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Potential of NFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sophie GallierDepartment of Food Science, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Derek Gragson
Charles Cabral
Rafael Jiménez-Flores
David W Everett
University of Otago · NZ

Funding

UNDERSTANDING THE ROLE OF SMALL RNAS IN ARABIDOPSIS POLLEN DEVELOPMENTP20RR016475 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI ACKLEY, BRIAN DOUGLAS · 2001 to 2011
$38.1M
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR016475NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR16475
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this work was to assess the accuracy of different extraction methods of phospholipids and to measure the effect that processing has on phospholipid composition. Four methods of extracting phospholipids from buttermilk powder were compared to optimize recovery of sphingomyelin. Using the optimal method, the phospholipid profile of four dairy products (raw milk, raw cream, homogenized and pasteurized milk, and buttermilk powder) was determined. A total lipid extraction by the Folch method followed by a solid-phase extraction using the Bitman method was the most efficient technique to recover milk sphingomyelin. Milk processing (churning, centrifuging, homogenization, spray-drying) affected the profile of milk phospholipids, leading to a loss of sphingomyelin and phosphatidylcholine after centrifugation for cream separation. A corresponding decrease in the saturation content of the raw cream phospholipids and a loss of phosphatidylethanolamine after spray-drying to produce buttermilk powder were also observed.

Indexed as

AnimalsCattleFatty AcidsFood HandlingMilkPhospholipidsSolid Phase ExtractionSphingomyelinsFatty AcidsPhospholipidsSphingomyelins

Identifiers

PMID20828196
PMCPMC4243513
OpenAlexW2059287843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.