ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2011
Critical incidents in paediatric critical care: who is at risk?
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intensive care drug therapy and its potential adverse effects on blood pressure and heart rate in critically ill children.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2023Article
- The occurrence of adverse events in low-risk non-survivors in pediatric intensive care patients: an exploratory study.European journal of pediatrics · 2018Article
- Medical errors: the importance of the bullet's blunt end.European journal of pediatrics · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We evaluated the characteristics of children for whom critical incidents (CIs) were reported by performing prospective collection of patient data and retrospective review of reported CIs in a multidisciplinary neonatal-paediatric intensive care unit of a tertiary care university children's hospital. A period of 1 year was analysed (January to December 2007; 1,251 admissions). CIs comprised adverse events (actual patient injury), as well as near-misses. The report form of critical incidents was web-based and reporting was voluntary, anonymous and non-punitive. The severity of all CIs was divided into minor, moderate and major. Patients with and without CIs were compared regarding the following characteristics: Paediatric Index of Mortality (PIM2), duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay in the intensive care, admission mode (surgery, cardiopulmonary bypass, cardiac/non-cardiac unit), age and sex. There were 360 CI reports (83 per 1,000 patient days; 13% major, 26% moderate, 61% minor severity). Of these, 310 CIs could be assigned to 198 specific patients. In the univariate analysis, patient-related risk factors for CIs were higher PIM2 score (p < 0.0001), increased length of stay (p < 0.0001), mechanical ventilation (p < 0.0001), increased ventilator days (p < 0.0001), male gender (p = 0.022) and young age (p < 0.0001). Using a logistic regression model, mechanical ventilation (p < 0.0001), male gender (p = 0.034) and length of stay (p < 0.0001) continued to be associated with the occurrence of CIs. Conclusion CIs often occur in paediatric intensive care. Among the patient-related factors, male gender, mechanical ventilation, and length of stay are independently associated with CIs. Already known at admission to intensive care are male gender and, usually, requirement for mechanical ventilation. Improved knowledge of the risk factors for CIs could help to minimize their frequency and thus improve quality of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20827559What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.