Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20827488›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2010

Measurements of cancer extent in a conservatively treated prostate cancer biopsy cohort.

Ramzi Rajab, Gabrielle Fisher, Michael W Kattan, Christopher S Foster, Tim Oliver, Henrik Møller, Victor Reuter, Peter Scardino, Jack Cuzick, Daniel M Berney and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03912883 (Prognostic Factors in Prostate Cancer for Patients Treated by Watchful Waiting), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03912883 active not recruitingnot on this map

Prognostic Factors in Prostate Cancer for Patients Treated by Watchful Waiting

TypeobservationalSponsorQueen Mary University of LondonRan1999 to 2030Enrolled3,350ConditionsProstate Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ramzi RajabCentre for Molecular Oncology and Imaging, Queen Mary University of London, UK.
Gabrielle Fisher
Michael W Kattan
Christopher S Foster
Tim Oliver
Henrik Møller
Victor Reuter
Peter Scardino
Jack Cuzick
Daniel M Berney
Transatlantic Prostate Group
Queen Mary University of London · GBMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USCleveland Clinic · USUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

SPORE In Prostate CancerP50CA092629 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Yu Chen, MICHAEL J MORRIS · 2001 to 2026
$63.0M
Cancer Research UKMedical Research Council G0802851NCI NIH HHS P50 CA092629
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The optimal method for measuring cancer extent in prostate biopsy specimens is unknown. Seven hundred forty-four patients diagnosed between 1990 and 1996 with prostate cancer and managed conservatively were identified. The clinical end point was death from prostate cancer. The extent of cancer was measured in terms of number of cancer cores (NCC), percentage of cores with cancer (PCC), total length of cancer (LCC) and percentage length of cancer in the cores (PLC). These were correlated with prostate cancer mortality, in univariate and multivariate analysis including Gleason score and prostate-specific antigen (PSA). All extent of cancer variables were significant predictors of prostate cancer death on univariate analysis: NCC, hazard ration (HR) = 1.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.04-1.28, P = 0.011; PPC, HR = 1.01, 95% CI = 1.01-1.02, P < 0.0001; LCC, HR = 1.02, 95% CI = 1.01-1.03, P = 0.002; PLC, HR = 1.01, 95% CI = 1.01-1.02, P = 0.0001. In multivariate analysis including Gleason score and baseline PSA, PCC and PLC were both independently significant P = 0.004 and P = 0.012, respectively, and added further information to that provided by PSA and Gleason score, whereas NNC and LCC were no longer significant (P = 0.5 and P = 0.3 respectively). In a final model, including both extent of cancer variables, PCC was the stronger, adding more value than PLC (χ² (1df) = 7.8, P = 0.005, χ² (1df) = 0.5, P = 0.48 respectively). Measurements of disease burden in needle biopsy specimens are significant predictors of prostate-cancer-related death. The percentage of positive cores appeared the strongest predictor and was stronger than percentage length of cancer in the cores.

Indexed as

Biopsy, NeedleAdenocarcinomaCohort StudiesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMalePathology, SurgicalProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID20827488
PMCPMC3853376
OpenAlexW1981665790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.