Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20827206›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in rheumatology2010

Novel therapeutic approaches for inclusion body myositis.

Thomas E Lloyd

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in rheumatology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Reply to Letter to the Editor.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2017
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Myostatin--the holy grail for muscle, bone, and fat?Current osteoporosis reports · 2013
    Review
  8. Inclusion body myositis: therapeutic approaches.Degenerative neurological and neuromuscular disease · 2012
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas E LloydDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe St./Meyer 5-119, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. tlloyd4@jhmi.edu
Johns Hopkins Medicine · US

Funding

A Drosophila model of motor neuron disease using mutations in P150 / Dynactin.K08NS062890 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI LLOYD, THOMAS E. · 2008 to 2012
$878k
NINDS NIH HHS K08 NS062890NINDS NIH HHS K08-NS062890
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review will highlight recent advances in developing strategies to accelerate muscle regeneration and to slow muscle degeneration in myositis, focusing primarily on inclusion body myositis (IBM). RECENT

findingsTherapies for accelerating muscle regeneration, primarily through inhibition of myostatin, have shown promise in the laboratory and are now entering clinical trials. Recent studies have implicated autophagy, a key cellular process involved in clearance of ubiquitinated aggregates, in the pathogenesis of familial and sporadic inclusion body myositis (sIBM). IBM has joined a growing list of diseases known as TDP-43 proteinopathies, in which this protein becomes mislocalized to the cytoplasm; however, it is unclear whether these protein aggregates or others are pathogenic in this disease. SUMMARY: New discoveries of biomarkers in sIBM and new insights into the pathogenesis of familial IBM are opening novel therapeutic pathways for these disorders. In particular, drugs that stimulate autophagy, already in development for cancer and neurodegenerative diseases, are candidates for clinical trials. These disease-specific therapies combined with novel therapies to accelerate muscle regeneration hold promise for future therapy for this devastating disease.

Indexed as

Drug DesignHumansMuscle Fibers, SkeletalMyositis, Inclusion BodyRegeneration

Identifiers

PMID20827206
PMCPMC4365473
OpenAlexW2322267500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.