Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20826832›Full record

Trial reportCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2010

Strategies for increasing mammography screening in primary care in Chile: results of a randomized clinical trial.

Klaus Püschel, Gloria Coronado, Gabriela Soto, Karla Gonzalez, Javiera Martinez, Sarah Holte, Beti Thompson

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Determinants of Population-Based Cancer Screening Performance at Primary Healthcare Institutions in China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  9. Validating Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Models in the Korean Cancer Prevention Study-II Biobank.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2020
    Article
  10. Low Awareness of Breast Cancer and Considerable Barriers to Early Presentation Among Saudi Women at a Primary Care Setting.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Perceived and objective breast cancer risk assessment in Chilean women living in an underserved area.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2012
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Klaus PüschelDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile. kpuschel@med.puc.cl
Gloria Coronado
Gabriela Soto
Karla Gonzalez
Javiera Martinez
Sarah Holte
Beti Thompson
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile · CLFred Hutch Cancer Center · US

Funding

Radionovela to address cervical cancer and the HPV vaccine for rural HispanicsU01CA114633 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI THOMPSON, BETI · 2005 to 2010
$2.7M
Improving Breast Cancer Screening at the Primary Care LevelR03TW007900 · FIC · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI THOMPSON, BETI · 2007 to 2009
$114k
FIC NIH HHS R03 TW007900FIC NIH HHS R03TW007900NCI NIH HHS R01CA114633
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer is the cancer with the highest incidence among women in Chile and in many Latin American countries. Breast cancer screening has very low compliance among Chilean women.

methodsWe compared the effects on mammography screening rates of standard care, of a low-intensity intervention based on mail contact, and of a high-intensity intervention based on mail plus telephone or personal contact. A random sample of 500 women with the age of 50 to 70 years registered at a community clinic in Santiago who had not had a mammogram in the past 2 years were randomly assigned to one of the three intervention groups. Six months after randomization, participants were re-evaluated for their compliance with mammography screening. The outcome was measured by self-report and by electronic clinical records. An intention to treat model was used to analyze the results.

resultsBetween 92% and 93% of participants completed the study. Based on electronic records, mammography screening rates increased significantly from 6% in the control group to 51.8% in the low-intensity group and 70.1% in the high-intensity group. About 14% of participants in each group received opportunistic advice, 100% of participants in the low- and high-intensity groups received the mail contact, and 50% in the high-intensity group received a telephone or personal contact.

conclusionA primary care intervention based on mail or brief personal contact could significantly improve mammogram screening rates. IMPACT: A relatively simple intervention could have a strong impact in breast cancer prevention in underserved communities.

Indexed as

AgedBreast NeoplasmsChileEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMammographyMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID20826832
PMCPMC3985495
OpenAlexW1976871776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.