Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20826474›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2010

Safety paradigm: genetic evaluation of therapeutic grade human embryonic stem cells.

Emma Stephenson, Caroline Mackie Ogilvie, Heema Patel, Glenda Cornwell, Laureen Jacquet, Neli Kadeva, Peter Braude, Dusko Ilic

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Translation and commercialization of regenerative medicines.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emma StephensonEmbryonic Stem Cell Laboratories, Guy's Assisted Conception Unit, Division of Reproduction and Endocrinology, King's College London, London, UK.
Caroline Mackie Ogilvie
Heema Patel
Glenda Cornwell
Laureen Jacquet
Neli Kadeva
Peter Braude
Dusko Ilic

Funding

Medical Research Council G0700092Medical Research Council G0701172Medical Research Council G0801061Wellcome Trust 086034
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of stem cells for regenerative medicine has captured the imagination of the public, with media attention contributing to rising expectations of clinical benefits. Human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) are the best model for capital investment in stem cell therapy and there is a clear need for their robust genetic characterization before scaling-up cell expansion for that purpose. We have to be certain that the genome of the starting material is stable and normal, but the limited resolution of conventional karyotyping is unable to give us such assurance. Advanced molecular cytogenetic technologies such as array comparative genomic hybridization for identifying chromosomal imbalances, and single nucleotide polymorphism analysis for identifying ethnic background and loss of heterozygosity should be introduced as obligatory diagnostic tests for each newly derived hESC line before it is deposited in national stem cell banks. If this new quality standard becomes a requirement, as we are proposing here, it would facilitate and accelerate the banking process, since end-users would be able to select the most appropriate line for their particular application, thus improving efficiency and streamlining the route to manufacturing therapeutics. The pharmaceutical industry, which may use hESC-derived cells for drug screening, should not ignore their genomic profile as this may risk misinterpretation of results and significant waste of resources.

Indexed as

Cell Culture TechniquesComparative Genomic HybridizationEmbryo Culture TechniquesEmbryo, MammalianEmbryonic Stem CellsGenomic InstabilityHumansKaryotypingPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRegenerative Medicine

Identifiers

PMID20826474
PMCPMC2988272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.