ReviewJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2010
Safety paradigm: genetic evaluation of therapeutic grade human embryonic stem cells.
Review in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Differentiation and Three-Dimensional Tissue Formation Attenuate Clonal Epigenetic Differences in Trichohyalin.Stem cells and development · 2016Article
- The Molecular Karyotype of 25 Clinical-Grade Human Embryonic Stem Cell Lines.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Article
- A thermoresponsive and chemically defined hydrogel for long-term culture of human embryonic stem cells.Nature communications · 2013Article
- Comprehensive characterization of genomic instability in pluripotent stem cells and their derived neuroprogenitor cell lines.Applied & translational genomics · 2012Article
- Screening of human pluripotent stem cells using CGH and FISH reveals low-grade mosaic aneuploidy and a recurrent amplification of chromosome 1q.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2012Article
- Molecular imaging of stem cell therapy in brain tumors: a step towards personalized medicine.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2012Article
- Derivation and propagation of human embryonic stem cell lines from frozen embryos in an animal product-free environment.Nature protocols · 2012Article
- Derivation of xeno-free and GMP-grade human embryonic stem cells--platforms for future clinical applications.PloS one · 2012Article
- Technical challenges in the derivation of human pluripotent cells.Stem cells international · 2011Article
- Translation and commercialization of regenerative medicines.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The use of stem cells for regenerative medicine has captured the imagination of the public, with media attention contributing to rising expectations of clinical benefits. Human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) are the best model for capital investment in stem cell therapy and there is a clear need for their robust genetic characterization before scaling-up cell expansion for that purpose. We have to be certain that the genome of the starting material is stable and normal, but the limited resolution of conventional karyotyping is unable to give us such assurance. Advanced molecular cytogenetic technologies such as array comparative genomic hybridization for identifying chromosomal imbalances, and single nucleotide polymorphism analysis for identifying ethnic background and loss of heterozygosity should be introduced as obligatory diagnostic tests for each newly derived hESC line before it is deposited in national stem cell banks. If this new quality standard becomes a requirement, as we are proposing here, it would facilitate and accelerate the banking process, since end-users would be able to select the most appropriate line for their particular application, thus improving efficiency and streamlining the route to manufacturing therapeutics. The pharmaceutical industry, which may use hESC-derived cells for drug screening, should not ignore their genomic profile as this may risk misinterpretation of results and significant waste of resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.