Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20824860›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2010

Maintenance chemotherapy for ovarian cancer.

Ling Mei, Hui Chen, Dong Mei Wei, Fang Fang, Guan J Liu, Huan Yu Xie, Xun Wang, Juan Zou, Xu Han, Dan Feng

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Maintenance chemotherapy for ovarian cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Knockout ofFrontiers in oncology · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Synergistic cytotoxic action of cisplatin and withaferin A on ovarian cancer cell lines.Biochemical and biophysical research communications · 2012
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ling MeiGynecology & Obstetrics Department, West China Second Hospital, Sichuan University, Clinical Medicine Dept of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China, 610041.
Hui Chen
Dong Mei Wei
Fang Fang
Guan J Liu
Huan Yu Xie
Xun Wang
Juan Zou
Xu Han
Dan Feng

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEpithelial ovarian cancer accounts for about 90% of all cases of ovarian cancer. Debulking surgery and six courses of platinum-based chemotherapy results in complete clinical remission (CCR) in up to 75% of cases. However, 75% of the responders will relapse within a median time of 18 to 28 months and only 20% to 40% of women will survive beyond five years. It has been suggested that maintenance chemotherapy could assist in prolonging remission. To date, there has not been a systematic review on the impact of maintenance chemotherapy for epithelial ovarian cancer.

objectivesTo assess the effectiveness and toxicity of maintenance chemotherapy for epithelial ovarian cancer and to evaluate the impact on quality of life (QoL). SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Review Group Specialized Register, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trails (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library Issue1, 2009), MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, CBMdisc, CNKI and VIP (to May 2009). We collected information from ongoing trials, checked reference lists of published articles and consulted experts in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing maintenance chemotherapy with no further intervention, maintenance radiotherapy or other maintenance therapy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed trials for eligibility and quality and extracted data. We analysed overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) rates as dichotomous variables. Toxicity and QoL data were extracted where present. All analyses were based on intention to treat (ITT) on the endpoint of survival. We also analysed data by subgroups of drugs. MAIN

resultsWe included six trials(902 women). When all chemotherapy regimens were combined, meta-analysis indicated no significant difference in 3, 5 and 10-year OS or PFS. For 5-year OS, the combined relative risk (RR) was 1.07 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.91 to 1.27) and for the 5-year PFS the combined RR was 1.18 (95% CI 0.88 to 1.58). Results were very similar when trials of different regimens were analysed. Comparing chemotherapy with radiotherapy, only the RR for 10-year PFS in pathological complete remission was in favour of whole abdominal radiotherapy 0.51 (95% CI 0.27 to 1.00), while 3 and 5-year OS rates have no significant difference between the two groups. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThere is no evidence to suggest that the use of platinum agents or doxorubicin used as maintenance chemotherapy is more effective than observation alone. Further investigations regarding the effect of paclitaxel used as maintenance chemotherapy are required.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCisplatinCyclophosphamideDisease-Free SurvivalDoxorubicinEpirubicinFemaleGlucuronatesHumansOvarian NeoplasmsQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRemission InductionAntineoplastic AgentsCisplatinCyclophosphamideDoxorubicinepidoxorubicin glucuronideEpirubicinGlucuronates

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.