SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2010
Stem cell transplantation for ischemic stroke.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.
- Stem cell-based interventions for the prevention of morbidity and mortality following hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy in newborn infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Stem cell-based interventions for the prevention and treatment of germinal matrix-intraventricular haemorrhage in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Stem cell transplantation for ischemic stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Cerebrolysin for acute ischaemic stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Cerebrolysin for acute ischaemic stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Clinical Outcomes of Transplanted Modified Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Stroke: A Phase 1/2a Study.Stroke · 2016Trial
- Trial
- The treatment of post-stroke dysarthria with a combination of different acupuncture types and language rehabilitation training: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Annals of translational medicine · 2022Article
- Feasibility of allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells in pediatric hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy: Phase I study.World journal of stem cells · 2021Article
- The Effects and Underlying Mechanisms of Cell Therapy on Blood-Brain Barrier Integrity After Ischemic Stroke.Current neuropharmacology · 2020Article
- Promoting neuroregeneration after perinatal arterial ischemic stroke: neurotrophic factors and mesenchymal stem cells.Pediatric research · 2018Review
- Enhancing Plasticity of the Central Nervous System: Drugs, Stem Cell Therapy, and Neuro-Implants.Neural plasticity · 2017Review
- Untested, unproven, and unethical: the promotion and provision of autologous stem cell therapies in Australia.Stem cell research & therapy · 2015Article
- Developing stem cell therapies for juvenile and adult-onset Huntington's disease.Regenerative medicine · 2015Review
- Superselective intra-arterial umbilical cord blood administration to BM in experimental animals.Bone marrow transplantation · 2014Article
- In vitro and in vivo neurogenic potential of mesenchymal stem cells isolated from different sources.Journal of biosciences · 2014Review
- Thoracic rat spinal cord contusion injury induces remote spinal gliogenesis but not neurogenesis or gliogenesis in the brain.PloS one · 2014Article
- Stem cell therapy in stroke: a review literature.International journal of preventive medicine · 2013Article
- Cell therapy: the final frontier for treatment of neurological diseases.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2013Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStudies in animal models of ischemic stroke have shown that stem cells transplanted into the brain can lead to functional improvement. However, to date, evidence for the benefits of stem cell transplantation in ischemic stroke patients is lacking.
objectivesTo assess the efficacy and safety of stem cell transplantation compared with conventional treatments in patients with ischemic stroke. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched February 2010), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2009, Issue 3), MEDLINE (1966 to August 2008), EMBASE (1980 to August 2008), Science Citation Index (1900 to August 2008), and BIOSIS (1926 to August 2008). We handsearched potentially relevant conference proceedings, screened reference lists, and searched ongoing trials and research registers (last searched November 2008). We also contacted individuals active in the field and stem cell manufacturers (last contacted December 2008). SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) recruiting patients with ischemic stroke, in any phase of the disease, and an ischemic lesion confirmed by computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scan. We included all types of stem cell transplantation regardless of cell source (autograft, allograft, or xenograft; embryonic, fetal, or adult; from brain or other tissues), route of cell administration (systemic or local), and dosage. The primary outcome was efficacy (assessed as combined functional outcome or disability and dependency) at longer follow-up (minimum six months). Secondary outcomes included post-procedure safety outcomes (death, worsening of neurological deficit, infections and neoplastic transformation). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. We contacted study authors for additional information. MAIN
resultsWe identified three very small RCTs. Two are still awaiting classification because only subgroups of patients could be included in this meta-analysis and additional unpublished data are needed. The third trial randomized 30 patients to intravenous transplantation of autologous mesenchymal stem cell (10 participants) or reference group (20 participants) (five participants, initially randomized to the intervention group, refused the treatment and were allocated to the reference group) and found a statistically non-significant functional improvement in treated patients at longer follow-up. No adverse cell-related events were reported. AUTHORS'
conclusionsNo large trials of stem cell transplantation have been performed in ischemic stroke patients and it is too early to know whether this intervention can improve functional outcome. Large, well-designed trials are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.