SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2010
Follicular flushing during oocyte retrieval in assisted reproductive techniques.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.
- Follicular flushing during oocyte retrieval in assisted reproductive techniques.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Follicular flushing during oocyte retrieval in assisted reproductive techniques.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Interventions for the prevention of OHSS in ART cycles: an overview of Cochrane reviews.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Follicular flushing during oocyte retrieval: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2012Pooled it
- The use of follicle flushing during oocyte retrieval in assisted reproductive technologies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2012Pooled it
- Evaluation of follicular flushing with double lumen needle in patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology treatments.JBRA assisted reproduction · 2021Trial
- A pilot trial of large versus small diameter needles for oocyte retrieval.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2013Trial
- Causes and Effects of Oocyte Retrieval Difficulties: A Retrospective Study of 10,624 Cycles.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2021Article
- Follicular flushing increases the number of oocytes retrieved in poor ovarian responders undergoing in vitro fertilization: a retrospective cohort study.BMC women's health · 2018Article
- Approaches to oocyte retrieval for advanced reproductive technology cycles planning to utilize in vitro maturation: a review of the many choices to be made.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2014Review
- Comprehensive evidence on assisted reproductive technologies.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Article
- Correlation between follicular diameters and flushing versus no flushing on oocyte maturity, fertilization rate and embryo quality.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2014Observational
- Follicle flushing in monofollicular in vitro fertilization almost doubles the number of transferable embryos.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2013Article
- Impact of follicular G-CSF quantification on subsequent embryo transfer decisions: a proof of concept study.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2013Article
- Oocyte retrieval at 140-mmHg negative aspiration pressure: A promising alternative to flushing and aspiration in assisted reproduction in women with low ovarian reserve.Journal of human reproductive sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUltrasound guided transvaginal aspiration of oocytes has replaced other methods of oocyte retrieval for in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). However, there is controversy over whether flushing yields a larger number of oocytes and a higher potential for pregnancy than aspiration only.
objectivesTo determine whether follicular aspiration and flushing increases live birth or ongoing pregnancy rates and the number of oocytes over aspiration alone in women undergoing IVF and ICSI. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Specialised Register of controlled trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PsycINFO and the citation lists of relevant publications (to April 2010). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials that compared follicular aspiration and flushing with aspiration alone were included. Trials were excluded if the flushing method comparison was confounded by comparisons of other methods. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Eligible studies were assessed for methodological quality. For dichotomous data, odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. For continuous data, mean differences were reported. The heterogeneity of the studies was examined by using statistical tests of homogeneity and the I(2) statistic. MAIN
resultsNo studies reported on the primary outcome of live birth. There was no evidence (3 studies, 164 patients) to suggest an association between follicular aspiration and flushing and ongoing or clinical pregnancy per woman randomised (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.57 to 2.38). There was no evidence of a difference in adverse events reported between follicular aspiration and flushing and aspiration only. There was no evidence of significant differences in increased oocyte yield per woman randomised (1 study, 44 patients). Without flushing the operative time was significantly shorter, by 3 to 15 minutes (3 studies, P < 0.001) and the dose of pethidine required was significantly less (50 mg versus 100 mg, P < 0.00001). AUTHORS'
conclusionsThere is no evidence that follicular aspiration and flushing is associated with improved clinical or ongoing pregnancy rates, nor an increase in oocyte yield. The operative time is significantly longer and more opiate analgesia is required for pain relief during oocyte retrieval. There is a lack of evidence regarding the effect of follicular aspiration and flushing on live birth rates in the identified data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.