Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20824831›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2010

Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockers during percutaneous coronary intervention and as the initial medical treatment of non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.

Xavier Bosch, Jaume Marrugat, Juan Sanchis

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Antiplatelet Therapy in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Interventional cardiology clinics · 2016
    Review
  3. Rising like the phoenix?Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2014
    Article
  4. RUC-4: a novel αIIbβ3 antagonist for prehospital therapy of myocardial infarction.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2014
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Translating from the rivers of Babylon to the coronary bloodstream.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2012
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Historical perspective and future directions in platelet research.Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH · 2011
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xavier BoschDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Villarroel 170, Barcelona, Spain, 08036.
Jaume Marrugat
Juan Sanchis
Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia · ESHospital Del Mar · ESUniversitat de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and in non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTEACS), the risk of acute vessel occlusion by thrombosis is high. IIb/IIIa blockers strongly inhibit platelet aggregation and may prevent mortality and myocardial infarction (MI). This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2001, and previously updated in 2007.

objectivesTo assess the effects and safety of IIb/IIIa blockers when administered during PCI, and as initial medical treatment in patients with NSTEACS. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) on The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2009), MEDLINE (1966 to October 2009), and EMBASE (1980 to October 2009). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials comparing intravenous IIb/IIIa blockers with placebo or usual care. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently selected studies for inclusion, assessed trial quality and extracted data. We collected major bleeding as adverse effect information from the trials. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used for effect measures. MAIN

resultsForty-eight trials involving 62,417 patients were included. During PCI, IIb/IIIa blockers decreased mortality at 30 days (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.95) and at six months (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.00). Death or MI was decreased both at 30 days (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.72), and at 6 months (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.81), although severe bleeding was increased (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.59; absolute risk increase (ARI) 8.0 per 1000). The efficacy results were homogeneous for every endpoint according to the clinical condition of the patients, but were less marked for patients pre-treated with clopidogrel, especially in patients without ACS.As initial medical treatment of NSTEACS, IIb/IIIa blockers did not decrease mortality at 30 days (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.03) or at six months (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.15), but slightly decreased death or MI at 30 days (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.86 to 0.99) and at six months (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.96), although severe bleeding was increased (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.43; ARI 1.4 per 1000). AUTHORS'

conclusionsWhen administered during PCI, intravenous IIb/IIIa blockers reduce the risk of death and of death or MI at 30 days and at six months, at a price of an increase in the risk of severe bleeding. The efficacy effects are homogeneous but are less marked in patients pre-treated with clopidogrel where they seem to be effective only in patients with ACS. When administered as initial medical treatment in patients with NSTEACS, these agents do not reduce mortality although they slightly reduce the risk of death or MI.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeAngioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryAspirinFibrinolytic AgentsHemorrhageHeparinHumansMyocardial InfarctionPlatelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa ComplexTiclopidineAspirinFibrinolytic AgentsHeparinPlatelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa ComplexTiclopidine

Identifiers

PMID20824831
OpenAlexW4238698686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.