Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20824718›Full record

ArticleCancer2011

Socioeconomic factors associated with adjuvant hormone therapy use in older breast cancer survivors.

Tina W F Yen, Linda K Czypinski, Rodney A Sparapani, Changbin Guo, Purushottam W Laud, Liliana E Pezzin, Ann B Nattinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Assessing the impact of a cooperative group trial on breast cancer care in the medicare population.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2012
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Fractures in a nationwide population-based cohort of users of breast cancer hormonal therapy.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tina W F YenDivision of Surgical Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226, USA. tyen@mcw.edu
Linda K Czypinski
Rodney A Sparapani
Changbin Guo
Purushottam W Laud
Liliana E Pezzin
Ann B Nattinger
Medical College of Wisconsin · US

Funding

OUTCOMES OF OLDER WOMEN WITH EARLY STAGE BREAST CANCERR01CA081379 · NCI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI NATTINGER, ANN B · 2000 to 2008
$3.0M
SES Disparities in Breast Cancer: Effect of Pharmaceutical CoverageR01CA127648 · NCI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI NATTINGER, ANN B · 2009 to 2013
$2.4M
Lymphedema incidence and risk factors among older breast cancer patientsK07CA125586 · NCI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI YEN, TINA WF · 2007 to 2011
$789k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA125586NCI NIH HHS K07CA125586NCI NIH HHS R01 CA081379NCI NIH HHS R01 CA127648NCI NIH HHS R01CA81379
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe authors sought to identify socioeconomic (SES) factors associated with adjuvant hormone therapy (HT) use among a contemporary population of older breast cancer survivors.

methodsTelephone surveys were conducted among women (ages 65-89 years) residing in 4 states (California, Florida, Illinois, and New York) who underwent initial breast cancer surgery in 2003. Demographic, SES, and treatment information was collected.

resultsOf 2191 women, 67% received adjuvant HT with either tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor (AI); 71% of those women were on an AI. When adjusting for multiple demographic and SES factors, predictors of HT use were better education (high school degree or higher), better informational/emotional support, and younger age (ages 65-79 years). Race/ethnicity, income, and insurance coverage for medication costs were not associated with receiving HT. For those on HT, when adjusting for all other factors, women were more likely to receive an AI if they had insurance coverage for some or all medication costs, if they were wealthier, if they had better informational/emotional support, and if they were younger (ages 65-69 years).

conclusionsThe majority of older women in this population-based cohort received adjuvant HT, and the adoption of AIs was early. The results indicted that providers should be aware that a woman's education level and support system influence her decision to take HT. Given the high cost of AIs, their benefits in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, and the current finding that women with no insurance coverage for medication costs were significantly less likely to receive an AI, we recommend that policymakers address this issue.

Indexed as

Socioeconomic FactorsSurvivorsAgedAged, 80 and overAromatase InhibitorsBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantEducational StatusFemaleHumansSocial SupportTamoxifenAromatase InhibitorsTamoxifen

Identifiers

PMID20824718
PMCPMC3010527
OpenAlexW2016937587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.