ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2010
Prospective evaluation of quality of life in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundZollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) is associated with complicated ulcer disease of the upper gastrointestinal tract. While management of ZES has dramatically improved with proton pump inhibitor therapy, quality of life in medically treated patients has not been evaluated.
methodsOver a 3-year period, 52 patients with ZES were prospectively evaluated at 6-month intervals with upper endoscopy and gastric acid analysis to evaluate the efficacy of current drug therapy and completion of SF36v2 forms. At each 6-month visit, patients' medication and problem lists were reviewed, comorbidities assessed, and any gastrointestinal symptoms recorded. Co-morbidity was represented as a simple illness count for the main analysis. The chronic disease score and the Charlson index were used for sensitivity analyses.
resultsThe unadjusted norm-based estimate of mental component score (MCS) for 52 patients with ZES (mean age 58, 65% male) was 49.8 (95% CI 46.4, 53.1). The unadjusted estimate of the physical component score (PCS) was 42.3 (95% CI 38.9, 45.7). As the number of illnesses or number of medications increased, there was a monotonic decrease in PCS scores. With multivariable adjustment, the coefficient for number of medications became non-significant. An increase in each of the co-morbidity indexes was associated with a decrease in PCS. Results did not vary by representation of co-morbidity. MCS was not significantly different from the general population.
conclusionsPatients with medically managed ZES have norm-based estimates of the mental component scores as measured by the SF-36v2 that approximate normal values, while the physical component scores were decreased with this reduction largely explained by co-morbid illness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.