ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2011
Can an immunohistochemistry method differentiate intestinal tuberculosis from Crohn's disease in biopsy specimens?
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Overlap Between Crohn's Disease and Intestinal Tuberculosis: A Never-Ending Story.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Utility of anti-Heliyon · 2022Article
- Application value of tissue tuberculosis antigen combined with Xpert MTB/RIF detection in differential diagnoses of intestinal tuberculosis and Crohn's disease.BMC infectious diseases · 2021Article
- Aptamer Detection ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021Article
- TB or Not TB: Crohn's Disease, Peritoneal Tuberculosis, or Both?Digestive diseases and sciences · 2019Article
- Observational
- Routine diagnosis of intestinal tuberculosis and Crohn's disease in Southern India.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Article
- Diagnosis of intestinal tuberculosis using a monoclonal antibody to Mycobacterium tuberculosis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIt is sometimes difficult to diagnose whether a patient has intestinal tuberculosis or Crohn's disease because both have similar clinical, pathologic, and endoscopic features. However, their therapies are completely different and a mistake in diagnosis can result with deterioration. Many laboratory methods for the diagnosis of tuberculosis require considerable time to receive a diagnostic result. We wanted to evaluate whether an immunohistochemical tuberculosis staining method can be helpful for faster differentiation of biopsy materials.
methodsWe used formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded histologically diagnosed small intestine (n=1), colon (n=7), skin (n=8), lung (n=5), lymph node (n=24) tuberculosis and Crohn's disease (n = 28) biopsy materials only with granulomas. Demographic characteristics like age and gender were also obtained. Pathology specimens were stained immunohistochemically with an antibody to VP-M660, targeting the 38-kDa antigen of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
resultsIn the M. tuberculosis group, 33/45 of patients have positive immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining (73% sensitivity, 93% specificity), whereas only two of 28 patients have positive staining in the Crohn's group (p<0.001). The positive staining with IHC was detected as 85.7, 75, 75, and 60% in colon, lymph node, skin, and lung granulomas, respectively, in M. tuberculosis patients.
conclusionsImmunohistochemical staining of biopsy specimens with anti-VP-M660 seems to be a simple and fast technique with 73% sensitivity and 93% specificity for establishing an earlier differentiation of M. tuberculosis from Crohn's disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.