Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20824378›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2010

One hundred thirty resections for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor: evaluating the impact of minimally invasive and parenchyma-sparing techniques.

Joseph DiNorcia, Minna K Lee, Patrick L Reavey, Jeanine M Genkinger, James A Lee, Beth A Schrope, John A Chabot, John D Allendorf

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Minimally invasiveWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. [Laparoscopic pancreatic resection].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2017
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Thirty-day outcomes underestimate endocrine and exocrine insufficiency after pancreatic resection.HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Distal pancreatic resection for neuroendocrine tumors: is laparoscopic really better than open?Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2015
    Article
  15. Incidence and severity of pancreatogenic diabetes after pancreatic resection.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2015
    Article
  16. [Minimally invasive pancreatic tumor surgery : oncological safety and surgical feasibility].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2014
    Review
  17. Laparoscopic resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Joseph DiNorciaCollege of Physicians and Surgeons, Department of Surgery, Columbia University, 161 Fort Washington Avenue, Suite 820, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Minna K Lee
Patrick L Reavey
Jeanine M Genkinger
James A Lee
Beth A Schrope
John A Chabot
John D Allendorf

Funding

POSTDOCTORAL TRAINING IN CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASET32HL007854 · NHLBI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Marwah Abdalla, Michael Argenziano · 1996 to 2026
$14.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL 007854-14
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreasingly, surgeons apply minimally invasive and parenchyma-sparing techniques to the management of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET). The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of these approaches on patient outcomes.

methodsWe retrospectively collected data on patients with PNET and compared perioperative and pathologic variables. Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Factors influencing survival were evaluated using a Cox proportional hazards model.

resultsOne hundred thirty patients underwent resection for PNET. Traditional resections included 43 pancreaticoduodenectomies (PD), 38 open distal pancreatectomies (DP), and four total pancreatectomies. Minimally invasive and parenchyma-sparing resections included 25 laparoscopic DP, 11 central pancreatectomies, five enucleations, three partial pancreatectomies, and one laparoscopic-assisted PD. Compared to traditional resections, the minimally invasive and parenchyma-sparing resections had shorter hospital stays. By univariate analysis of neuroendocrine carcinoma, liver metastases and positive resection margins correlated with poor survival. There was an increase in minimally invasive or parenchyma-sparing resections over the study period with no differences in morbidity, mortality, or survival.

conclusionIn this series, there has been a significant increase in minimally invasive and parenchyma-sparing techniques for PNET. This shift did not increase morbidity or compromise survival. In addition, minimally invasive and parenchyma-sparing operations yielded shorter hospital stays.

Indexed as

AgedFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresNeuroendocrine TumorsPancreasPancreatectomyPancreatic NeoplasmsProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.