Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20824375›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2010

Patient and peri-operative predictors of morbidity and mortality after esophagectomy: American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP), 2005-2008.

Birat Dhungel, Brian S Diggs, John G Hunter, Brett C Sheppard, John T Vetto, James P Dolan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Short-term outcome for high-risk patients after esophagectomy.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2022
    Article
  13. Trajectories of Patient-Reported Outcomes After Palliative Gastrointestinal Surgery in Advanced Cancer: Is Good Quality of Life Sustainable?Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Birat DhungelDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, L223A, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
Brian S Diggs
John G Hunter
Brett C Sheppard
John T Vetto
James P Dolan

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOur aim was to determine what specific patient and peri-operative factors contribute to major complications after esophagectomy.

methodsUsing the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, data for esophagectomies between the years 2005 and 2008 were extracted and analyzed. Thirty-day post-operative complications were classified into seven major groups: (1) wound infections, (2) respiratory complications (pneumonia, intubation), (3) cardiac complications, (4) deep venous thrombosis, (5) sepsis/septic shock, (6) re-operation, and (7) death. Univariate analysis and logistic regression modeling were performed to determine if a significant association existed between patient factors or peri-operative factors and these post-operative complications.

resultsOne thousand thirty-two patients who underwent esophagectomy were identified. Diabetes was the strongest pre-operative independent predictor of death (odds ratio (OR) 10.98; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.37-1.15, p < 0.1) or respiratory (OR 1.86; 95% CI 1.03-3.29, p = 0.04) or cardiac (OR 5.14; 95% CI 1.93-13.20, p < 0.01) complications following esophagectomy. Thoracotomy performed during the operation was not associated with an increased risk of respiratory or cardiac complications.

conclusionsThe major predictors of morbidity after an esophagectomy are the patient factors of diabetes, dyspnea, peripheral vascular disease, and cerebrovascular accident while the peri-operative factors are pre-operative international normalized ratio, contaminated wound classification, and American Society of Anesthesiologists class. Similarly, the major predictors of mortality are diabetes, dyspnea, and age for patient factors and contaminated wound classification for peri-operative factors.

Indexed as

Quality ImprovementDatabases, FactualEsophageal DiseasesEsophagectomyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMorbidityPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsStomach Diseases

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.