ArticleJournal of community health2011
Chlamydia screening of adolescent females: a survey of providers in Hawaii.
Article in Journal of community health, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing the Accuracy of Physician Self-disclosed PID Reporting: A Comparison of Data from a Physician Survey and Actual PID Case Reports from a State Surveillance System.Hawai'i journal of medicine & public health : a journal of Asia Pacific Medicine & Public Health · 2018Article
- Sexually Transmitted Disease Prevention Policies in the United States: Evidence and Opportunities.Sexually transmitted diseases · 2016Review
- A Survey of Physicians' Attitudes and Practices about the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccine in Hawai'i.Hawai'i journal of medicine & public health : a journal of Asia Pacific Medicine & Public Health · 2015Article
- Sexually transmitted disease (STD) update: a review of the CDC 2010 STD treatment guidelines and epidemiologic trends of common STDs in Hawai'i.Hawai'i journal of medicine & public health : a journal of Asia Pacific Medicine & Public Health · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hawaii currently ranks first among states for chlamydia screening of young women based on recent Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) measures and has consistently ranked in the top ten states in the US for annual reported chlamydia rates since 2002. A statewide provider survey was conducted in October 2007 and March 2008 to assess chlamydia screening practices and beliefs and identify potential barriers to screening. The overall reported screening rate for 15-19 year old females was 66.9% with significant differences by practice specialty (obstetrician/gynecologists were more likely to screen than family practitioners or pediatricians) and practice setting (higher rates of screening in non-private practice settings). Providers who were unaware of health plan reimbursement for screening and those who targeted screening only for clients perceived to be at "high risk" were significantly less likely to routinely provide screening. The Hawaii State Department of Health is currently working in consort with health care providers and the state's dominant health insurance carriers to address these issues through targeted provider educational interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.