ArticlePLoS computational biology2010
Regression analysis for constraining free parameters in electrophysiological models of cardiac cells.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
86 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gradient-based parameter optimization method to determine membrane ionic current composition in human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes.Scientific reports · 2022Trial
- Neuronal excitability and parameter variability in the Hodgkin-Huxley model.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- CardioFit: a WebGL-based tool for fast and efficient parametrization of cardiac action potential models to fit user-provided data.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- A large population of cell-specific action potential models replicating fluorescence recordings of voltage in rabbit ventricular myocytes.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- Creating cell-specific computational models of stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes using optical experiments.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Computational modeling of cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmogenesis: toward clinical translation.Physiological reviews · 2024Review
- Cell-specific models of hiPSC-CMs developed by the gradient-based parameter optimization method fitting two different action potential waveforms.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Creating cell-specific computational models of stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes using optical experiments.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Neural network emulation of the human ventricular cardiomyocyte action potential: a tool for more efficient computation in pharmacological studies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Emergent activity, heterogeneity, and robustness in a calcium feedback model of the sinoatrial node.Biophysical journal · 2023Article
- Modeling incomplete penetrance in long QT syndrome type 3 through ion channel heterogeneity: an in silico population study.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2023Article
- Article
- Neuronal population models reveal specific linear conductance controllers sufficient to rescue preclinical disease phenotypes.iScience · 2021Article
- Intracellular NaInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- The transient outward potassium current plays a key role in spiral wave breakup in ventricular tissue.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2021Article
- Computational prediction of drug response in short QT syndrome type 1 based on measurements of compound effect in stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Mechanisms of Premature Ventricular Complexes Caused by QT Prolongation.Biophysical journal · 2021Article
- Bayesian Calibration of Electrophysiology Models Using Restitution Curve Emulators.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Article
- Calibration of ionic and cellular cardiac electrophysiology models.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine · 2020Review
26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A major challenge in computational biology is constraining free parameters in mathematical models. Adjusting a parameter to make a given model output more realistic sometimes has unexpected and undesirable effects on other model behaviors. Here, we extend a regression-based method for parameter sensitivity analysis and show that a straightforward procedure can uniquely define most ionic conductances in a well-known model of the human ventricular myocyte. The model's parameter sensitivity was analyzed by randomizing ionic conductances, running repeated simulations to measure physiological outputs, then collecting the randomized parameters and simulation results as "input" and "output" matrices, respectively. Multivariable regression derived a matrix whose elements indicate how changes in conductances influence model outputs. We show here that if the number of linearly-independent outputs equals the number of inputs, the regression matrix can be inverted. This is significant, because it implies that the inverted matrix can specify the ionic conductances that are required to generate a particular combination of model outputs. Applying this idea to the myocyte model tested, we found that most ionic conductances could be specified with precision (R(2) > 0.77 for 12 out of 16 parameters). We also applied this method to a test case of changes in electrophysiology caused by heart failure and found that changes in most parameters could be well predicted. We complemented our findings using a Bayesian approach to demonstrate that model parameters cannot be specified using limited outputs, but they can be successfully constrained if multiple outputs are considered. Our results place on a solid mathematical footing the intuition-based procedure simultaneously matching a model's output to several data sets. More generally, this method shows promise as a tool to define model parameters, in electrophysiology and in other biological fields.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.