ArticlePattern recognition letters2010
A protein sequence meta-functional signature for calcium binding residue prediction.
Article in Pattern recognition letters, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accurate informatic modeling of tooth enamel pellicle interactions by training substitution matrices with Mat4Pep.Frontiers in materials · 2024Article
- GraphSite: Ligand Binding Site Classification with Deep Graph Learning.Biomolecules · 2022Article
- A Comprehensive Review of Computation-Based Metal-Binding Prediction Approaches at the Residue Level.BioMed research international · 2022Review
- Recognition of Metal Ion Ligand-Binding Residues by Adding Correlation Features and Propensity Factors.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Protein ligand-specific binding residue predictions by an ensemble classifier.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
- Article
- Calciomics: integrative studies of Ca2+-binding proteins and their interactomes in biological systems.Metallomics : integrated biometal science · 2013Review
- Self-assembly of filamentous amelogenin requires calcium and phosphate: from dimers via nanoribbons to fibrils.Biomacromolecules · 2012Article
- The optimised model of predicting protein-metal ion ligand binding residues.IET systems biologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The diversity of characterized protein functions found amongst experimentally interrogated proteins suggests that a vast array of unknown functions remains undiscovered. These protein functions are imparted by specific geometric distributions of amino acid residue chemical moieties, each contributing a functional interaction. We hypothesize that individual residue function contributions are predictable through sequence analytic knowledge based algorithms, and that they can be recombined to understand composite protein function by predicting spatial relation in tertiary structure. We assess the former by training a meta-functional signature algorithm to specifically predict calcium ion binding residues from protein sequence. We estimate the latter by testing for match between predictive contribution of positions in predicted secondary structures and patterns of side chain proximity forced by secondary structure moieties. Specific training for calcium binding results in 83% area under the receiver operator characteristic curve added value over random (AUCoR) and p<10(-300) significance as measured by Kendall's τ in ten fold cross validation for parallel sets of 811 residues in 336 proteins and 696 residues in 299 proteins. Training for generalized function results in 63% AUCoR and p≅10(-221) for the same tests. Including inference of side chain proximity improves predictive ability by 2% AUCoR consistently. The results demonstrate that protein meta-functional signatures can be trained to predict specific protein functions by considering amino acid identity and structural features accessible from sequence, laying the groundwork for composite sequence based function site prediction.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.