ArticleHypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979)2010
Cardiovascular consequences of genetic variation at -6/235 in human angiotensinogen using "humanized" gene-targeted mice.
Article in Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Role of environmental toxicants in the development of hypertensive and cardiovascular diseases.Toxicology reports · 2022Review
- Comprehensive Assessments of Energy Balance in Mice.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2017Article
- Allele-specific expression of angiotensinogen in human subcutaneous adipose tissue.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2013Article
- Gene trapping uncovers sex-specific mechanisms for upstream stimulatory factors 1 and 2 in angiotensinogen expression.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2012Article
- The central nervous system and inflammation in hypertension.Current opinion in pharmacology · 2011Review
- Structural biology: On stress and pressure.Nature · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Genetic and functional data support a role for angiotensinogen in blood pressure control, and many population studies have suggested that polymorphisms in the angiotensinogen gene contribute to hypertension. Two common haplotypes of the human angiotensinogen gene are -6A/235T and -6G/235M. To study their contributions to blood pressure regulation in a controlled model system, we developed triple-transgenic mice expressing either -6A/235T or -6G/235M human angiotensinogen, expressing either an overexpressed and poorly regulated (REN9) or a tightly regulated (PAC160) human renin, and all carrying a null mutation in the endogenous murine angiotensinogen gene. These humanized mice were then examined for blood pressure differences at baseline and after a high-salt diet, changes in cardiovascular organ weight, and differences in angiotensinogen and renin gene expression. Mice expressing the -6G/235M haplotype on the PAC160 background exhibited increased blood pressure and cardiac hypertrophy at baseline. In contrast, all of the mice with the REN9 background had equivalent baseline blood pressures. On the REN9 background, there was a greater increase in blood pressure in -6A/235T in response to a high-salt diet, providing evidence it may be a susceptibility allele. There were no differences in angiotensinogen expression between haplotypes on either background strain. The data suggest that the impact of angiotensinogen haplotypes on cardiovascular end points may be dependent on renin status and environmental influences, such as dietary sodium. These insights may help explain the discrepancies among observational studies that have examined roles for the -6A/235T and -6G/235M angiotensinogen haplotypes in varied human populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.