Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20822351›Full record

ReviewExpert review of vaccines2010

Nano-microparticles as immune adjuvants: correlating particle sizes and the resultant immune responses.

Moses O Oyewumi, Amit Kumar, Zhengrong Cui

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert review of vaccines, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 189 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
189citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

189 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Microparticles synthesized from itaconate polyesters enable metabolite delivery and elicit immunoregulatory outcomes.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Intestinal uptake regulates T cell responses to dietary antigens.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

129 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Moses O OyewumiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Northeastern Ohio Universities Colleges of Medicine and Pharmacy, Rootstown, OH 44272, USA. moyewumi@neoucom.edu
Amit Kumar
Zhengrong Cui

Funding

Topical DNA immunization by modifying the hair follicle cycleR01AI078304 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI CUI, ZHENGRONG · 2008 to 2011
$1.4M
A tri-antigen nasal anthrax vaccine against toxins and vegetative bacilli R21AI070538 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI CUI, ZHENGRONG · 2007 to 2008
$379k
NIAID NIH HHS AI070538NIAID NIH HHS AI078304NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI078304NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI070538
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of novel immune adjuvants is emerging as a significant area of vaccine delivery based on the continued necessity to amplify immune responses to a wide array of new antigens that are poorly immunogenic. This article specifically focuses on the application of nanoparticles and microparticles as vaccine adjuvants. Many investigators are in agreement that the size of the particles is crucial to their adjuvant activities. However, reports on correlating the size of particle-based adjuvants and the resultant immune responses have been conflicting, with investigators on both sides of the fence with impressive data in support of the effectiveness of particles with small sizes (submicron) over those with larger sizes (micron) and vice versa, while other investigators reported data that showed submicron- and micron-sized particles are effective to the same degree as immune adjuvants. We have generated a list of biological, immunological and, more importantly, vaccine formulation parameters that may have contributed to the inconsistency from different studies and made recommendations on future studies attempting to correlate the size of particulate adjuvants and the immune responses induced. The information gathered could lead to strategies to optimize the performance of nano-microparticles as immune adjuvants.

Indexed as

MicrospheresNanoparticlesAdaptive ImmunityAdjuvants, ImmunologicAnimalsHumansImmunity, InnateParticle SizeVaccinesAdjuvants, ImmunologicVaccines

Identifiers

PMID20822351
PMCPMC2963573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.