Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20822213›Full record

Trial reportDevelopmental psychology2010

Do different types of school mathematics development depend on different constellations of numerical versus general cognitive abilities?

Lynn S Fuchs, David C Geary, Donald L Compton, Douglas Fuchs, Carol L Hamlett, Pamela M Seethaler, Joan D Bryant, Christopher Schatschneider

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Developmental psychology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 263 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Understanding the complexities of mathematical cognition: A multi-level framework.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2023
    Article
  12. Mathematics achievement in the last year of primary school. Longitudinal relationship with general cognitive skills and prior mathematics knowledge.European journal of psychology of education = Journal europeen de psychologie de l'education · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lynn S FuchsDepartment of Special Education, Peabody College, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203, USA. lynn.fuchs@vanderbilt.edu
David C Geary
Donald L Compton
Douglas Fuchs
Carol L Hamlett
Pamela M Seethaler
Joan D Bryant
Christopher Schatschneider
Vanderbilt University · USFlorida State University · USUniversity of Missouri · US

Funding

THREE-TIERED PREVENTION MODEL TO BETTER SERVE ALL STUDENP30HD015052 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI DYKENS, ELISABETH MAY · 1985 to 2014
$18.6M
Preventing and Understanding Mathematics DisabilityR01HD053714 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI FUCHS, LYNN S · 2007 to 2018
$5.5M
Mathematical Development in Learning Diasbled ChildrenR37HD045914 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI GEARY, DAVID C · 2004 to 2012
$3.4M
Mathematical Development in Learning Diasbled ChildrenR01HD045914 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI GEARY, DAVID C · 2003 to 2003
$344k
NICHD NIH HHS HD15052NICHD NIH HHS P30 HD015052NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD045914NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD053714NICHD NIH HHS R37 HD045914
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the interplay between basic numerical cognition and domain-general abilities (such as working memory) in explaining school mathematics learning. First graders (N = 280; mean age = 5.77 years) were assessed on 2 types of basic numerical cognition, 8 domain-general abilities, procedural calculations, and word problems in fall and then reassessed on procedural calculations and word problems in spring. Development was indexed by latent change scores, and the interplay between numerical and domain-general abilities was analyzed by multiple regression. Results suggest that the development of different types of formal school mathematics depends on different constellations of numerical versus general cognitive abilities. When controlling for 8 domain-general abilities, both aspects of basic numerical cognition were uniquely predictive of procedural calculations and word problems development. Yet, for procedural calculations development, the additional amount of variance explained by the set of domain-general abilities was not significant, and only counting span was uniquely predictive. By contrast, for word problems development, the set of domain-general abilities did provide additional explanatory value, accounting for about the same amount of variance as the basic numerical cognition variables. Language, attentive behavior, nonverbal problem solving, and listening span were uniquely predictive.

Indexed as

AchievementAptitudeChild DevelopmentCognitionMathematicsProblem SolvingAttentionChildChild, PreschoolComprehensionFemaleGeneralization, PsychologicalHumansIndividualityLanguage DevelopmentMale

Identifiers

PMID20822213
PMCPMC2976828
OpenAlexW2073673049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.