ReviewCurrent urology reports2010
Selection of ideal candidates for neuromodulation in refractory overactive bladder.
Review in Current urology reports, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Electrical neuromodulation in the management of lower urinary tract dysfunction: evidence, experience and future prospects.Therapeutic advances in urology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sacral neuromodulation is a minimally invasive, reversible treatment option that has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for patients with urgency/frequency and urge incontinence. While long-term success rates are high, the high treatment cost and the need for operative revision or explantation in cases of failure make the selection of ideal candidates particularly important. Because predictive factors for success and the exact mechanism of action are not known, physicians must rely on a preimplantation test procedure, either in the office or in the operating room, to select patients for implantation of a pulse generator. In this paper, we review the recent literature on performing a test procedure with both temporary and permanent leads and the selection of optimal candidates for sacral neuromodulation therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20821358What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.