ReviewNature reviews. Neurology2010
CGRP and its receptors provide new insights into migraine pathophysiology.
Review in Nature reviews. Neurology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 235 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
235 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 532 citations in OpenAlex.
- The emerging role of the meningeal lymphatic and glymphatic systems in migraine pathophysiology: a systematic review.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of CGRP monoclonal antibodies for migraine prevention in episodic migraine; a network Meta-analysis.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Optimal Dose of Erenumab for Preventive Treatment of Episodic Migraine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Current neuropharmacology · 2022Pooled it
- Placebo and nocebo phenomena in anti- CGRP monoclonal antibody trials for migraine prevention: a meta-analysis.Journal of neurology · 2020Pooled it
- Effects of Anti-Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide for Migraines: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Pooled it
- Erenumab for Preventive Treatment of Migraine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Safety.Drugs · 2019Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Rimegepant for the Acute Treatment of Migraine: Evidence From Randomized Controlled Trials.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2019Pooled it
- The efficacy and safety of calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibody for episodic migraine: a meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2018Pooled it
- Calcitonin gene-related peptide and pain: a systematic review.The journal of headache and pain · 2017Pooled it
- Efficacy of Ubrogepant in the Acute Treatment of Migraine With Mild Pain vs Moderate or Severe Pain.Neurology · 2022Trial
- Long-term reductions in disease impact in patients with chronic migraine following preventive treatment with eptinezumab.BMC neurology · 2022Trial
- Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Erenumab after a Single Subcutaneous Injection Dose in Healthy Chinese Subjects.Clinical drug investigation · 2022Trial
- Tolerability and safety of galcanezumab in patients with chronic cluster headache with up to 15 months of galcanezumab treatment.Headache · 2022Trial
- Cardiovascular outcomes in adults with migraine treated with eptinezumab for migraine prevention: pooled data from four randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies.The journal of headache and pain · 2021Trial
- Trial
- Serum CGRP, VIP, and PACAP usefulness in migraine: a case-control study in chronic migraine patients in real clinical practice.Molecular biology reports · 2020Trial
- One-year sustained efficacy of erenumab in episodic migraine: Results of the STRIVE study.Neurology · 2020Trial
- Phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled study of galcanezumab in patients with chronic cluster headache: Results from 3-month double-blind treatment.Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache · 2020Trial
- Making Better Dose Decisions: Using Exposure-Response Modeling to Integrate Efficacy Outcome of Two Phase IIb Clinical Trials of Ubrogepant for Migraine Treatment.Clinical and translational science · 2020Trial
175 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past 300 years, the migraine field has been dominated by two main theories-the vascular theory and the central neuronal theory. The success of vasoconstrictors such as ergotamine and the triptans in treating acute migraine bolstered the vascular theory, but evidence is now emerging that vasodilatation is neither necessary nor sufficient to induce a migraine attack. Attention is now turning to the core migraine circuits in the brain, which include the trigeminal ganglia, trigeminal nucleus, medullary modulatory regions, pons, periaqueductal gray matter, hypothalamus and thalamus. Migraine triggers are likely to reflect a disturbance in overall balance of the circuits involved in the modulation of sensory activity, particularly those with relevance to the head. In this Review, we consider the evidence pointing towards a neuronal mechanism in migraine development, highlighting the role of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), which is found in small to medium-sized neurons in the trigeminal ganglion. CGRP is released during migraine attacks and can trigger migraine in patients, and CGRP receptor antagonists can abort migraine. We also examine whether other drugs, such as triptans, might exert their antimigraine effects via their actions on the neuronal circuit as opposed to the intracranial vasculature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.