Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20820184›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2010

Ten years of genetics and genomics: what have we achieved and where are we heading?

Edith Heard, Sarah Tishkoff, John A Todd, Marc Vidal, Günter P Wagner, Jun Wang, Detlef Weigel, Richard Young

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The road ahead in genetics and genomics.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2020
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The role of transposable elements in health and diseases of the central nervous system.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2013
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Edith HeardINSERM U/CNRS UMR, Institut Curie - Centre de Recherche, Paris, France. Edith.Heard@curie.fr
Sarah Tishkoff
John A Todd
Marc Vidal
Günter P Wagner
Jun Wang
Detlef Weigel
Richard Young

Funding

Transcriptional Regulatory Networks in Living CellsR01HG002668 · NHGRI · WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RES · PI YOUNG, RICHARD · 2003 to 2016
$17.9M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG002668Wellcome Trust 079895Wellcome Trust 091157
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To celebrate the first 10 years of Nature Reviews Genetics, we asked eight leading researchers for their views on the key developments in genetics and genomics in the past decade and the prospects for the future. Their responses highlight the incredible changes that the field has seen, from the explosion of genomic data and the many possibilities it has opened up to the ability to reprogramme adult cells to pluripotency. The way ahead looks similarly exciting as we address questions such as how cells function as systems and how complex interactions among genetics, epigenetics and the environment combine to shape phenotypes.

Indexed as

Periodicals as TopicForecastingGeneticsGenomicsTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID20820184
PMCPMC3004366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.