Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20819870›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

Developing syndrome definitions based on consensus and current use.

Wendy W Chapman, John N Dowling, Atar Baer, David L Buckeridge, Dennis Cochrane, Michael A Conway, Peter Elkin, Jeremy Espino, Julia E Gunn, Craig M Hales and 11 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Clinical research informatics: a conceptual perspective.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2012
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A Practitioner-Driven Research Agenda for Syndromic Surveillance.Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Wendy W ChapmanDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. wendy.w.chapman@gmail.com
John N Dowling
Atar Baer
David L Buckeridge
Dennis Cochrane
Michael A Conway
Peter Elkin
Jeremy Espino
Julia E Gunn
Craig M Hales
Lori Hutwagner
Mikaela Keller
Catherine Larson
Rebecca Noe
Anya Okhmatovskaia
Karen Olson
Marc Paladini
Matthew Scholer
Carol Sniegoski
David Thompson
Bill Lober

Funding

NLP Foundational Studies & Ontologies for Syndromic Surveillance from ED ReportsR01LM009427 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI CHAPMAN, WENDY W. · 2007 to 2009
$1.4M
NLM NIH HHS 1 R01LM009427-01NLM NIH HHS R01 LM009427
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveStandardized surveillance syndromes do not exist but would facilitate sharing data among surveillance systems and comparing the accuracy of existing systems. The objective of this study was to create reference syndrome definitions from a consensus of investigators who currently have or are building syndromic surveillance systems.

designClinical condition-syndrome pairs were catalogued for 10 surveillance systems across the United States and the representatives of these systems were brought together for a workshop to discuss consensus syndrome definitions.

resultsConsensus syndrome definitions were generated for the four syndromes monitored by the majority of the 10 participating surveillance systems: Respiratory, gastrointestinal, constitutional, and influenza-like illness (ILI). An important element in coming to consensus quickly was the development of a sensitive and specific definition for respiratory and gastrointestinal syndromes. After the workshop, the definitions were refined and supplemented with keywords and regular expressions, the keywords were mapped to standard vocabularies, and a web ontology language (OWL) ontology was created. LIMITATIONS: The consensus definitions have not yet been validated through implementation.

conclusionThe consensus definitions provide an explicit description of the current state-of-the-art syndromes used in automated surveillance, which can subsequently be systematically evaluated against real data to improve the definitions. The method for creating consensus definitions could be applied to other domains that have diverse existing definitions.

Indexed as

Communicable DiseasesGroup ProcessesHumansPopulation SurveillanceSyndromeUnited States

Identifiers

PMID20819870
PMCPMC2995670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.