Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20819109›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2010

The trade-off between costs and outcomes: the case of acute myocardial infarction.

Jonas Schreyögg, Tom Stargardt

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
16.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. An econometric approach to aggregating multiple cardiovascular outcomes in German hospitals.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Investigating the geographic disparity in quality of care: the case of hospital readmission after acute myocardial infarction in Italy.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Investigating the relationship between costs and outcomes for English mental health providers: a bi-variate multi-level regression analysis.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Estimation of a physician practice cost function.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2017
    Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Cost-effectiveness of open versus laparoscopic appendectomy: a multilevel approach with propensity score matching.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2012
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Jonas SchreyöggInstitute for Health Care Management and Health Economics, School of Business, Economics and Social Sciences, University of Hamburg, Von-Melle-Park 5, 20146 Hamburg, Germany. jonas.schreyoegg@wiso.uni-hamburg.de
Tom Stargardt
Universität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate and to quantify the relationship between hospital costs and health outcomes for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in Veterans Health Administration (VHA) hospitals using individual-level data for costs and outcomes. DATA SOURCES: VHA administrative files for the fiscal years 2000-2006. STUDY

designCosts were defined as costs incurred during the index hospitalization for treatment of AMI. Mortality and readmission, assessed 1 year after the index hospitalization, were used as measures of clinical outcome. We examined health outcomes as a function of costs and other patient-level and hospital-level characteristics using a two-stage Cox proportional hazard model that accounted for competing risks within a multilevel framework. To control for patient comorbidities, we compiled a comprehensive list of comorbidities that have been found in other studies to affect mortality and readmissions. PRINCIPAL

findingsWe found that costs were negatively associated with mortality and readmissions. Every U.S.$100 less spent is associated with a 0.63 percent increase in the hazard of dying and a 1.24 percent increase in the hazard to be readmitted conditional on not dying. This main finding remained unchanged after a number of sensitivity checks.

conclusionsOur results suggest that there is a trade-off between costs and outcomes. The negative association between costs and mortality suggests that outcomes should be monitored closely when introducing cost-containment programs. Additional studies are needed to examine the cost-outcome relationship for conditions other than AMI to see whether our results are consistent.

Indexed as

Hospital CostsOutcome Assessment, Health CareAgedCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleMyocardial Infarction

Identifiers

PMID20819109
PMCPMC2997322
OpenAlexW1697414156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.