Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20818886›Full record

Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine2010

Nanofiltered C1 inhibitor concentrate for treatment of hereditary angioedema.

Bruce L Zuraw, Paula J Busse, Martha White, Joshua Jacobs, William Lumry, James Baker, Timothy Craig, J Andrew Grant, David Hurewitz, Leonard Bielory and 20 more

4 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 141 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
141citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00289211 phase3completednot on this map

LEVP2005-1/Part A: A Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled, Clinical Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Purified C1 Esterase Inhibitor (Human) for the Treatment of HAE in Acute Attacks

TypeinterventionalSponsorShireRan2005 to 2007Enrolled83ConditionsHereditary AngioedemaArmsC1 esterase inhibitor [human] (C1INH-nf), Placebo (saline)
NCT00438815 phase3completednot on this map

LEVP2006-1 CHANGE 2 Trial (C1-Inhibitor in Hereditary Angioedema Nanofiltration Generation Evaluating Efficacy): Open-Label Safety/Efficacy Repeat Exposure Study of C1INH-nf (Human) in the Treatment of Acute HAE Attacks

TypeinterventionalSponsorShireRan2006 to 2009Enrolled113ConditionsHereditary AngioedemaArmsC1 esterase inhibitor [human] (C1INH-nf)
NCT00462709 phase3completednot on this map

LEVP2006-4 CHANGE 3 Trial (C1-Inhibitor in Hereditary Angioedema Nanofiltration Generation Evaluating Efficacy): Open-Label Use of C1INH-nf (Human) for the Prophylactic Treatment to Prevent HAE Attacks and as Treatment in Acute HAE Attacks

TypeinterventionalSponsorShireRan2006 to 2009Enrolled146ConditionsHereditary AngioedemaArmsC1 esterase inhibitor [human] (C1INH-nf)
NCT01005888 phase3completednot on this map

LEVP2005-1/Part B: A Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled, Clinical Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Purified C1 Esterase Inhibitor (Human) as Prophylactic Treatment to Prevent HAE Attacks

TypeinterventionalSponsorShireRan2005 to 2007Enrolled26ConditionsHereditary AngioedemaArmsC1 esterase inhibitor [human] (C1INH-nf), Placebo (saline)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

141 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Interventions for the long-term prevention of hereditary angioedema attacks.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  6. Efficacy of Treatment of Non-hereditary Angioedema.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2018
    Pooled it
  7. Guideline
  8. Trial
  9. A randomized trial of human C1 inhibitor prophylaxis in children with hereditary angioedema.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2019
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Review
  16. Innate immunity: current understandings and future perspectives.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  17. Garadacimab for the long-term prophylaxis of hereditary angioedema.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2026
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

81 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors.

Bruce L ZurawUniversity of California, San Diego, USA. bzuraw@ucsd.edu
Paula J Busse
Martha White
Joshua Jacobs
William Lumry
James Baker
Timothy Craig
J Andrew Grant
David Hurewitz
Leonard Bielory
William E Cartwright
Majed Koleilat
Walter Ryan
Oren Schaefer
Michael Manning
Pragnesh Patel
Jonathan A Bernstein
Roger A Friedman
Robert Wilkinson
David Tanner
Gary Kohler
Glenne Gunther
Robyn Levy
James McClellan
Joseph Redhead
David Guss
Eugene Heyman
Brent A Blumenstein
Ira Kalfus
Michael M Frank

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHereditary angioedema due to C1 inhibitor deficiency is characterized by recurrent acute attacks of swelling that can be painful and sometimes life-threatening.

methodsWe conducted two randomized trials to evaluate nanofiltered C1 inhibitor concentrate in the management of hereditary angioedema. The first study compared nanofiltered C1 inhibitor concentrate with placebo for treatment of an acute attack of angioedema. A total of 68 subjects (35 in the C1 inhibitor group and 33 in the placebo group) were given one or two intravenous injections of the study drug (1000 units each). The primary end point was the time to the onset of unequivocal relief. The second study was a crossover trial involving 22 subjects with hereditary angioedema that compared prophylactic twice-weekly injections of nanofiltered C1 inhibitor concentrate (1000 units) with placebo during two 12-week periods. The primary end point was the number of attacks of angioedema per period, with each subject acting as his or her own control.

resultsIn the first study, the median time to the onset of unequivocal relief from an attack was 2 hours in the subjects treated with C1 inhibitor concentrate but longer than 4 hours in those given placebo (P=0.02). In the second study, the number of attacks per 12-week period was 6.26 with C1 inhibitor concentrate given as prophylaxis, as compared with 12.73 with placebo (P<0.001); the subjects who received the C1 inhibitor concentrate also had significant reductions in both the severity and the duration of attacks, in the need for open-label rescue therapy, and in the total number of days with swelling.

conclusionsIn subjects with hereditary angioedema, nanofiltered C1 inhibitor concentrate shortened the duration of acute attacks. When used for prophylaxis, nanofiltered C1 inhibitor concentrate reduced the frequency of acute attacks. (Funded by Lev Pharmaceuticals; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00289211, NCT01005888, NCT00438815, and NCT00462709.)

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdultAnalysis of VarianceAngioedemas, HereditaryChildComplement C1 Inhibitor ProteinComplement Inactivating AgentsCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousMaleNanotechnologyProportional Hazards ModelsUltrafiltrationComplement C1 Inhibitor ProteinComplement Inactivating Agents

Identifiers

PMID20818886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.