Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20818832›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics2010

A comparison of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of pregabalin and gabapentin.

Howard N Bockbrader, David Wesche, Raymond Miller, Sunny Chapel, Nancy Janiczek, Paula Burger

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative StudyReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 227 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
227citing papers in PubMed, 13 pooled it
13.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04246619 phase4terminatednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of Pregabalin and Duloxetine in Patients With Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (PDPN): the Effect of Pain on Cognitive Function, Sleep and Quality of Life (BLOSSOM)

TypeinterventionalSponsorKRKARan2019 to 2021Enrolled254ConditionsPainful Diabetic Peripheral NeuropathyArmsPregabalin, Duloxetine
NCT04705480 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Pregabalin vs. Gabapentin on Reducing Opioid Usage in Trauma Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorCAMC Health SystemRan2021 to 2024Enrolled109ConditionsAnalgesics, Gabapentin, Injuries, NarcoticsArmsPregabalin 50mg, Gabapentin 300mg, Neither Pregabalin nor Gabapentin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

227 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 657 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Potential TMS biomarkers for GABAAlcohol, clinical & experimental research · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Interventions for postburn pruritus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pregabalin add-on for drug-resistant focal epilepsy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  9. Pregabalin add-on for drug-resistant focal epilepsy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

167 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Howard N BockbraderPfizer Global Research & Development, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105, USA. howard.bockbrader@pfizer.com
David Wesche
Raymond Miller
Sunny Chapel
Nancy Janiczek
Paula Burger
Pfizer (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pregabalin and gabapentin share a similar mechanism of action, inhibiting calcium influx and subsequent release of excitatory neurotransmitters; however, the compounds differ in their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics. Gabapentin is absorbed slowly after oral administration, with maximum plasma concentrations attained within 3-4 hours. Orally administered gabapentin exhibits saturable absorption--a nonlinear (zero-order) process--making its pharmacokinetics less predictable. Plasma concentrations of gabapentin do not increase proportionally with increasing dose. In contrast, orally administered pregabalin is absorbed more rapidly, with maximum plasma concentrations attained within 1 hour. Absorption is linear (first order), with plasma concentrations increasing proportionately with increasing dose. The absolute bioavailability of gabapentin drops from 60% to 33% as the dosage increases from 900 to 3600 mg/day, while the absolute bioavailability of pregabalin remains at > or = 90% irrespective of the dosage. Both drugs can be given without regard to meals. Neither drug binds to plasma proteins. Neither drug is metabolized by nor inhibits hepatic enzymes that are responsible for the metabolism of other drugs. Both drugs are excreted renally, with elimination half-lives of approximately 6 hours. Pregabalin and gabapentin both show dose-response relationships in the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia and partial seizures. For neuropathic pain, a pregabalin dosage of 450 mg/day appears to reduce pain comparably to the predicted maximum effect of gabapentin. As an antiepileptic, pregabalin may be more effective than gabapentin, on the basis of the magnitude of the reduction in the seizure frequency. In conclusion, pregabalin appears to have some distinct pharmacokinetic advantages over gabapentin that may translate into an improved pharmacodynamic effect.

Indexed as

AminesAnalgesicsAnticonvulsantsCyclohexanecarboxylic AcidsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug InteractionsGabapentingamma-Aminobutyric AcidPregabalinAminesAnalgesicsAnticonvulsantsCyclohexanecarboxylic AcidsGabapentingamma-Aminobutyric AcidPregabalin

Identifiers

PMID20818832
OpenAlexW2102234164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.