Racial, ethnic, and tribal classifications in biomedical research with biological and group harm.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Data sharing in the PRIMED Consortium: Design, implementation, and recommendations for future policymaking.American journal of human genetics · 2025
   Review
2. Charting the Next Road Map for CSF Biomarkers in Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2023
   Review
3. Social and scientific motivations to move beyond groups in allele frequencies: The TOPMed experience.American journal of human genetics · 2022
   Review
4. Ethical Issues in Genetics and Infectious Diseases Research: An Interdisciplinary Expert Review.Ethics, medicine, and public health · 2021
   Article
5. Obligations of the "Gift": Reciprocity and Responsibility in Precision Medicine.The American journal of bioethics : AJOB · 2021
   Article
6. Stigma in African genomics research: Gendered blame, polygamy, ancestry and disease causal beliefs impact on the risk of harm.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2020
   Article
7. Knowing who to trust: exploring the role of 'ethical metadata' in mediating risk of harm in collaborative genomics research in Africa.BMC medical ethics · 2014
   Article
8. Which Sámi? Sámi inclusion criteria in population-based studies of Sámi health and living conditions in Norway - an exploratory study exemplified with data from the SAMINOR study.International journal of circumpolar health · 2013
   Article
9. Investigating the potential for ethnic group harm in collaborative genomics research in Africa: is ethnic stigmatisation likely?Social science & medicine (1982) · 2012
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Is deidentification sufficient to protect health privacy in research?2010

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as