ArticleThe journal of nutrition, health & aging2010
Physicians and caregivers: ready and waiting for increased participation in clinical research.
Article in The journal of nutrition, health & aging, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gauging innovation and health impact from biomedical research: survey results and interviews with recipients of EU-funding in the fields of Alzheimer's disease, breast cancer and prostate cancer.Health research policy and systems · 2023Review
- Recommendations to address key recruitment challenges of Alzheimer's disease clinical trials.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2023Review
- US Adults' Likelihood to Participate in Dementia Prevention Drug Trials: Results from the National Poll on Healthy Aging.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2023Article
- Patient Engagement: The Fundació ACE Framework for Improving Recruitment and Retention in Alzheimer's Disease Research.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2018Review
- Attitudes of small animal practitioners toward participation in veterinary clinical trials.Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association · 2017Article
- Obstacles and opportunities in Alzheimer's clinical trial recruitment.Health affairs (Project Hope) · 2014Article
- Representations and practices of prevention in elderly populations: investigating acceptance to participate in and adhesion to an intervention study for the prevention of Alzheimer's disease (ACCEPT study)--the need for a multidisciplinary approach.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2012Article
- Recruitment, retention and other methodological issues related to clinical trials for Alzheimer's disease.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2012Article
- Clinical practice patterns of generalists and specialists in Alzheimer's disease: what are the differences, and what difference do they make?The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2010Article
- Implications of the Impact Survey for payors across Europe.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2010Article
- The time has arrived to meet the challenge of Alzheimer's disease in Europe.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2010Article
- Facilitating Alzheimer disease research recruitment.Alzheimer disease and associated disordersReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Progressive development of pharmacotherapy for Alzheimer's disease (AD) as well as non-pharmacological treatments is critically dependent on the timely recruitment of appropriate subjects for clinical trials. Accordingly, the IMPACT survey sought to determine the level of awareness of clinical trials and the willingness to foster patient involvement/participation in research studies. IMPACT survey participants were recruited via the Internet in equal numbers from 5 European countries-France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom. During April and May 2009, 250 caregivers and 500 physicians who agreed to participate in this market-based survey completed a 30-minute Web-based questionnaire that included items concerning awareness of clinical research and willingness to facilitate participation of AD patients in such research. Awareness of local clinical trials amongst both caregivers (24% overall; range by country, 14% to 34%) and physicians (19% overall; range by country, 13% to 30%) was found to be low in all countries surveyed. In contrast, the willingness of physicians to refer patients to, and caregivers to support their participation in, clinical trials was extremely high (98% and 81%, respectively). These results strongly indicate that physicians and caregivers are ready and waiting to become more involved in clinical research. Initiatives to increase awareness of clinical trials amongst caregivers and physicians and to conduct clinical trials within the geographical area of as many potential participants as possible should result in much more effective patient recruitment to AD clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.