Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20818414›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2010

Evolution of diverse cell division and vesicle formation systems in Archaea.

Kira S Makarova, Natalya Yutin, Stephen D Bell, Eugene V Koonin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 121 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
121citing papers in PubMed
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

121 citing papers in PubMed, 235 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. A conserved oscillatory system that positions the divisome in Archaea.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The Archaeal Cell Cycle.Annual review of cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Extracellular vesicle formation inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Diversity, Origin and Evolution of the ESCRT Systems.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. The cell biology of archaea.Nature microbiology · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

61 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kira S MakarovaNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20894, USA.
Natalya Yutin
Stephen D Bell
Eugene V Koonin
National Center for Biotechnology Information · USNational Institutes of Health · USUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Comparative Analysis Of Completely Sequenced GenomesZIALM000073 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI KOONIN, EUGENE V · 2009 to 2025
$43.1M
Finding Protein Sequence Motifs--Methods And ApplicationsZIALM000061 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI KOONIN, EUGENE V · 2009 to 2025
$10.6M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA LM000073
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently a novel cell division system comprised of homologues of eukaryotic ESCRT-III (endosomal sorting complex required for transport III) proteins was discovered in the hyperthermophilic crenarchaeote Sulfolobus acidocaldarius. On the basis of this discovery, we undertook a comparative genomic analysis of the machineries for cell division and vesicle formation in Archaea. Archaea possess at least three distinct membrane remodelling systems: the FtsZ-based bacterial-type system, the ESCRT-III-based eukaryote-like system and a putative novel system that uses an archaeal actin-related protein. Many archaeal genomes encode assortments of components from different systems. Evolutionary reconstruction from these findings suggests that the last common ancestor of the extant Archaea possessed a complex membrane remodelling apparatus, different components of which were lost during subsequent evolution of archaeal lineages. By contrast, eukaryotes seem to have inherited all three ancestral systems.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionArchaeaArchaeal ProteinsBacteriaCell DivisionCell MembraneCytoplasmic VesiclesEndosomal Sorting Complexes Required for TransportEukaryotaGenome, ArchaealArchaeal ProteinsEndosomal Sorting Complexes Required for TransportFtsZ protein, Methanococcus jannaschii

Identifiers

PMID20818414
PMCPMC3293450
OpenAlexW2019030289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.