Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20818326›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Urology2010

Prostate cancer screening: current status and future perspectives.

Seth A Strope, Gerald L Andriole

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03911999 (To Investigate the Diagnostic Accuracy of Exosomal microRNA in Predicting the Aggressiveness of Prostate Cancer in Chinese Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03911999 completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

To Investigate the Diagnostic Accuracy of Exosomal microRNA in Predicting the Aggressiveness of Prostate Cancer in Chinese Patients

TypeobservationalSponsorChinese University of Hong KongRan2018 to 2020Enrolled180ConditionsProstate Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Prostate Cancer Epigenetics: From Basic Mechanisms to Clinical Implications.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. [-2]proPSA is an early marker for prostate cancer aggressiveness.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2014
    Article
  19. Article
  20. The present and future of prostate cancer urine biomarkers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Seth A StropeWashington University School of Medicine, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, Siteman Cancer Center, 4960 Children's Place, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Gerald L Andriole
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the publication of the long-term results of two randomized screening trials and updates to screening guidelines from many organizations, the past 2 years have been eventful in the field of prostate cancer screening. Both the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial--which failed to identify a benefit of screening in a community setting--and the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer--which showed a modest benefit to screening in a clinical trial setting--have sought to address the role of screening in reducing mortality from prostate cancer. Epidemiologic evidence supports the role of PSA screening in the stage and grade migration of prostate cancer, but to date the evidence for its role in changing mortality patterns is more equivocal. As a result, little support exists at present among urologic and cancer prevention organizations for population-based PSA screening. Particularly in the USA, where PSA screening has been relatively widespread, reductions in prostate-cancer-specific mortality are likely to be in part related to improvements in treatment, rather than solely to PSA screening. The substantial risk of overdiagnosis and overtreatment of latent prostate cancer means that methods to increase the specificity of prostate cancer screening, and particularly its ability to identify high-risk disease, are essential. Strategies such as the use of 5alpha-reductase inhibitors in high-risk patients, and the continued development of urinary and genetic markers hold promise in this regard.

Indexed as

ForecastingHumansMaleProstatic NeoplasmsRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID20818326
OpenAlexW2093307117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.