Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20817943›Full record

ArticleGenome research2010

Shifts in the intensity of purifying selection: an analysis of genome-wide polymorphism data from two closely related yeast species.

Eyal Elyashiv, Kevin Bullaughey, Shmuel Sattath, Yosef Rinott, Molly Przeworski, Guy Sella

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Genome research · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Quantifying the fraction of new mutations that are recessive lethal.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. How Much DoesGenetics · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Background selection as null hypothesis in population genomics: insights and challenges fromPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Species boundaries in the human pathogen Paracoccidioides.Fungal genetics and biology : FG & B · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eyal ElyashivDepartment of Evolution, Systematics, and Ecology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91905, Israel.
Kevin Bullaughey
Shmuel Sattath
Yosef Rinott
Molly Przeworski
Guy Sella

Funding

Adaptive evolution of non coding DNA and gene expression divergence in DrosophilaR01GM083228 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI ANDOLFATTO, PETER · 2009 to 2013
$1.5M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS GM083228NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083228
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How much does the intensity of purifying selection vary among populations and species? How uniform are the shifts in selective pressures across the genome? To address these questions, we took advantage of a recent, whole-genome polymorphism data set from two closely related species of yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and S. paradoxus, paying close attention to the population structure within these species. We found that the average intensity of purifying selection on amino acid sites varies markedly among populations and between species. As expected in the presence of extensive weakly deleterious mutations, the effect of purifying selection is substantially weaker on single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) segregating within populations than on SNPs fixed between population samples. Also in accordance with a Nearly Neutral model, the variation in the intensity of purifying selection across populations corresponds almost perfectly to simple measures of their effective size. As a first step toward understanding the processes generating these patterns, we sought to tease apart the relative importance of systematic, genome-wide changes in the efficacy of selection, such as those expected from demographic processes and of gene-specific changes, which may be expected after a shift in selective pressures. For that purpose, we developed a new model for the evolution of purifying selection between populations and inferred its parameters from the genome-wide data using a likelihood approach. We found that most, but not all changes seem to be explained by systematic shifts in the efficacy of selection. One population, the sake-derived strains of S. cerevisiae, however, also shows extensive gene-specific changes, plausibly associated with domestication. These findings have important implications for our understanding of purifying selection as well as for estimates of the rate of molecular adaptation in yeast and in other species.

Indexed as

Genetic SpeciationPolymorphism, Single NucleotideEvolution, MolecularGenome, FungalGeographyModels, BiologicalModels, GeneticSaccharomycesSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSelection, GeneticSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID20817943
PMCPMC2963819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.