Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20817138›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2010

Mutability of Y-chromosomal microsatellites: rates, characteristics, molecular bases, and forensic implications.

Kaye N Ballantyne, Miriam Goedbloed, Rixun Fang, Onno Schaap, Oscar Lao, Andreas Wollstein, Ying Choi, Kate van Duijn, Mark Vermeulen, Silke Brauer and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of human genetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 144 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
144citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

144 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Forensic genetics in the omics era.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

84 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Kaye N BallantyneDepartment of Forensic Molecular Biology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Miriam Goedbloed
Rixun Fang
Onno Schaap
Oscar Lao
Andreas Wollstein
Ying Choi
Kate van Duijn
Mark Vermeulen
Silke Brauer
Ronny Decorte
Micaela Poetsch
Nicole von Wurmb-Schwark
Peter de Knijff
Damian Labuda
Hélène Vézina
Hans Knoblauch
Rüdiger Lessig
Lutz Roewer
Rafal Ploski
Tadeusz Dobosz
Lotte Henke
Jürgen Henke
Manohar R Furtado
Manfred Kayser

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nonrecombining Y-chromosomal microsatellites (Y-STRs) are widely used to infer population histories, discover genealogical relationships, and identify males for criminal justice purposes. Although a key requirement for their application is reliable mutability knowledge, empirical data are only available for a small number of Y-STRs thus far. To rectify this, we analyzed a large number of 186 Y-STR markers in nearly 2000 DNA-confirmed father-son pairs, covering an overall number of 352,999 meiotic transfers. Following confirmation by DNA sequence analysis, the retrieved mutation data were modeled via a Bayesian approach, resulting in mutation rates from 3.78 × 10(-4) (95% credible interval [CI], 1.38 × 10(-5) - 2.02 × 10(-3)) to 7.44 × 10(-2) (95% CI, 6.51 × 10(-2) - 9.09 × 10(-2)) per marker per generation. With the 924 mutations at 120 Y-STR markers, a nonsignificant excess of repeat losses versus gains (1.16:1), as well as a strong and significant excess of single-repeat versus multirepeat changes (25.23:1), was observed. Although the total repeat number influenced Y-STR locus mutability most strongly, repeat complexity, the length in base pairs of the repeated motif, and the father's age also contributed to Y-STR mutability. To exemplify how to practically utilize this knowledge, we analyzed the 13 most mutable Y-STRs in an independent sample set and empirically proved their suitability for distinguishing close and distantly related males. This finding is expected to revolutionize Y-chromosomal applications in forensic biology, from previous male lineage differentiation toward future male individual identification.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, Human, YForensic SciencesGenetic LociGenetic MarkersHumansMaleMicrosatellite RepeatsMutationPaternal AgeGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID20817138
PMCPMC2933352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.