ArticleLancet (London, England)2010
Community-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Article in Lancet (London, England), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Functional Study of Response Regulator ArlR Mutants in Staphylococcus Aureus.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2024Article
- A prospective observational study of community-acquired bacterial bloodstream infections in Metro Manila, the Philippines.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2022Observational
- Comparison of virulence-related determinants between the ST59-t437 and ST239-t030 genotypes of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.BMC microbiology · 2021Article
- Article
- Evaluation of Platensimycin and Platensimycin-Inspired Thioether Analogues against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Topical and Systemic Infection Mouse Models.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2019Article
- MixedBioMed research international · 2017Article
- Identification of source and sink populations for the emergence and global spread of the East-Asia clone of community-associated MRSA.Genome biology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20816535What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.