Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20815901›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2010

Large-scale proteomic identification of S100 proteins in breast cancer tissues.

Patrizia Cancemi, Gianluca Di Cara, Nadia Ninfa Albanese, Francesca Costantini, Maria Rita Marabeti, Rosa Musso, Carmelo Lupo, Elena Roz, Ida Pucci-Minafra

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Immunohistochemical characteristics of basal-like breast cancer.Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland) · 2016
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Calcium-binding protein S100P and cancer: mechanisms and clinical relevance.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2012
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Patrizia CancemiDipartimento di Oncologia Sperimentale e Applicazioni Cliniche (DOSAC), Università di Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Gianluca Di Cara
Nadia Ninfa Albanese
Francesca Costantini
Maria Rita Marabeti
Rosa Musso
Carmelo Lupo
Elena Roz
Ida Pucci-Minafra
University of Palermo · ITLa Maddalena · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAttempts to reduce morbidity and mortality in breast cancer is based on efforts to identify novel biomarkers to support prognosis and therapeutic choices. The present study has focussed on S100 proteins as a potentially promising group of markers in cancer development and progression. One reason of interest in this family of proteins is because the majority of the S100 genes are clustered on a region of human chromosome 1q21 that is prone to genomic rearrangements. Moreover, there is increasing evidence that S100 proteins are often up-regulated in many cancers, including breast, and this is frequently associated with tumour progression.

methodsSamples of breast cancer tissues were obtained during surgical intervention, according to the bioethical recommendations, and cryo-preserved until used. Tissue extracts were submitted to proteomic preparations for 2D-IPG. Protein identification was performed by N-terminal sequencing and/or peptide mass finger printing.

resultsThe majority of the detected S100 proteins were absent, or present at very low levels, in the non-tumoral tissues adjacent to the primary tumor. This finding strengthens the role of S100 proteins as putative biomarkers. The proteomic screening of 100 cryo-preserved breast cancer tissues showed that some proteins were ubiquitously expressed in almost all patients while others appeared more sporadic. Most, if not all, of the detected S100 members appeared reciprocally correlated. Finally, from the perspective of biomarkers establishment, a promising finding was the observation that patients which developed distant metastases after a three year follow-up showed a general tendency of higher S100 protein expression, compared to the disease-free group.

conclusionsThis article reports for the first time the comparative proteomic screening of several S100 protein members among a large group of breast cancer patients. The results obtained strongly support the hypothesis that a significant deregulation of multiple S100 protein members is associated with breast cancer progression, and suggest that these proteins might act as potential prognostic factors for patient stratification. We propose that this may offer a significant contribution to the knowledge and clinical applications of the S100 protein family to breast cancer.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBlotting, WesternBreastBreast NeoplasmsCohort StudiesElectrophoresis, Gel, Two-DimensionalFemaleHumansNeoplasm MetastasisPrognosisProteomeS100 ProteinsSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationBiomarkers, TumorProteomeS100 Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20815901
PMCPMC2944176
OpenAlexW1972722078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.