Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20814657›Full record

ReviewHerz2010

[Interventional, intramyocardial stem cell therapy in ischemic cardiomyopathy: update 2010].

M W Bergmann, K Jaquet, C Schneider, K Krause, A Ujeyl, K-H Kuck

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Herz, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Mast cell tryptase, a still enigmatic enzyme.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2004
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M W BergmannKlinik für Kardiologie, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Lohmühlenstrasse 5, Hamburg, Germany. docbergmann@mac.com
K Jaquet
C Schneider
K Krause
A Ujeyl
K-H Kuck
Asklepios Klinik St. Georg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe intracoronary application of autologous bone marrow cells has proven hitherto to be safe but not sufficiently effective in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. The interventional application of cells injected directly into the myocardium represents one possible approach to improve effectiveness. TECHNIQUES: The NOGA method is based on the CARTO technique, which has been evaluated extensively for safety and feasibility in patients with heart failure. In a first step, an electrically and anatomically exact map of the left ventricle is obtained. Guided by this three-dimensional map direct injection of the cells into the ischemic area can be easily performed. CLINICAL STUDIES: Since its introduction in 2002 many studies have proven the safety, feasibility and effectiveness of NOGA-guided regenerative therapy to the left ventricle. While several studies also suggest effectiveness regarding various parameters of left ventricular function, no larger multicenter study is available to date. Such studies with also clinical endpoints are currently ongoing.

conclusionThe currently available data support, but do not yet prove, the hypothesis that intramyocardial stem cell therapy using NOGA-guided injection into the myocardium is safe and feasible in both acute and chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy. Ongoing trials will reveal whether this approach will become the standard form for applying cell therapy to the heart.

Indexed as

Bone Marrow TransplantationFeasibility StudiesFollow-Up StudiesGuided Tissue RegenerationHeart FailureHumansInjections, IntramuscularMyocardial InfarctionMyocardial IschemiaVentricular Dysfunction, LeftVentricular Function, Left

Identifiers

PMID20814657
OpenAlexW1551314550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.