Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20814018›Full record

Trial reportArteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology2010

Risk factor differences for aortic versus coronary calcified atherosclerosis: the multiethnic study of atherosclerosis.

Michael H Criqui, Aruna Kamineni, Matthew A Allison, Joachim H Ix, Jeffrey J Carr, Mary Cushman, Robert Detrano, Wendy Post, Nathan D Wong

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Photodynamic Therapy for Atherosclerosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Triglycerides and Residual Atherosclerotic Risk.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2021
    Observational
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Michael H CriquiDepartment of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0607, USA. mcriqui@ucsd.edu
Aruna Kamineni
Matthew A Allison
Joachim H Ix
Jeffrey J Carr
Mary Cushman
Robert Detrano
Wendy Post
Nathan D Wong
The Coordinating Center · USUniversity of Vermont · USUniversity of Washington · USUniversity of California, Irvine · US

Funding

Aortic Calcium: epidemiology and progressionR01HL072403 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI CRIQUI, MICHAEL H · 2003 to 2006
$2.1M
Adjunctive Use of Apyrase to Fibrinolytic TherapyR44HL095169 · NHLBI · APT THERAPEUTICS, INC. · PI CHEN, RIDONG · 2012 to 2013
$1.3M
SUBCLINICAL CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE STUDYN01HC095166 · HC · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT &ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI TRACY, RUSSELL P · 1999 to 2001
$758k
SUBCLINICAL CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE STUDY-FIELD CENTERN01HC095162 · HC · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SZKLO, MOYSES A · 1999 to 2000
$694k
SUBCLINICAL CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE STUDY--FIELD CENTERN01HC095161 · HC · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SHEA, STEVEN · 1999 to 2001
$642k
SUBCLINICAL CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE STUDY--FIELD CENTERN01HC095165 · HC · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY · PI BURKE, GREGORY L · 1999 to 2001
$616k
Fetuin-A: A Novel Biomarker of Vascular Calcification and Diabetes MellitusR21HL091217 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI IX, JOACHIM H · 2009 to 2010
$608k
SUBCLINICAL CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE STUDY--FIELD CENTERN01HC095160 · HC · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI SAAD, MOHAMMED F · 1999 to 2001
$592k
SUBCLINICAL CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE STUDY-FIELD CENTERN01HC095164 · HC · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI LIU, KIANG JOHN · 1999 to 2001
$511k
SUBCLINICAL CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE STUDY--FIELD CENTERN01HC095163 · HC · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI FOLSOM, AARON R · 1999 to 2001
$443k
SUBCLINICAL CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE STUDYN01HC095168 · HC · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BLUEMKE, DAVID A. · 1999 to 2000
$375k
SUBCLINICAL CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE COORDINATING CENTER-N01HC95159-268095159N01HC095159 · HC · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI KRONMAL, RICHARD A · 1999 to 2006
$304k
NHLBI NIH HHS HL091217NHLBI NIH HHS HL72403NHLBI NIH HHS N01 HC095159NHLBI NIH HHS N01 HC095169NHLBI NIH HHS N01-HC-95159NHLBI NIH HHS N01-HC-95160NHLBI NIH HHS N01-HC-95161NHLBI NIH HHS N01-HC-95162NHLBI NIH HHS N01-HC-95163NHLBI NIH HHS N01-HC-95164NHLBI NIH HHS N01-HC-95165NHLBI NIH HHS N01-HC-95166NHLBI NIH HHS N01-HC-95167NHLBI NIH HHS N01-HC-95168NHLBI NIH HHS N01-HC-95169NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL072403NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL091217
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe goal of this study was to compare and contrast coronary artery calcium (CAC) with abdominal aortic calcium (AAC) in terms of their associations with traditional and novel cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors. METHODS AND

resultsWe measured both AAC and CAC using computed tomography scans in 1974 men and women aged 45 to 84 years from a multiethnic cohort. Traditional and novel CVD risk factors were examined separately in relation to AAC and CAC, using logistic regression for qualitative categorical comparisons and multiple linear regression for quantitative continuous comparisons. AAC was significantly associated with cigarette smoking and dyslipidemia and showed no gender difference. In contrast, CAC showed much weaker associations with smoking and dyslipidemia and a strong male predominance. Age and hypertension were associated similarly and significantly with AAC and CAC. Novel risk factors generally showed no independent association with either calcium measure, although in subset analyses, phosphorus, but not calcium, was related to CAC. The receiver operating characteristic curves for the qualitative results and the r(2) values for the quantitative analyses were both much higher for AAC than for CAC.

conclusionsAAC showed stronger correlations with most CVD risk factors than did CAC. The predictive value of AAC compared with CAC for incident CVD events remains to be evaluated.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAorta, AbdominalAortic DiseasesAtherosclerosisCalcinosisCardiovascular DiseasesCohort StudiesCoronary Artery DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID20814018
PMCPMC2959146
OpenAlexW2104983570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.