Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20812770›Full record

ArticleDrug safety2010

Nature, occurrence and consequences of medication-related adverse events during hospitalization: a retrospective chart review in the Netherlands.

Lilian H F Hoonhout, Martine C de Bruijne, Cordula Wagner, Henk Asscheman, Gerrit van der Wal, Maurits W van Tulder

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Drug safety, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. A systematic review of approaches for calculating the cost of medication errors.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2016
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lilian H F HoonhoutVU University Medical Centre, EMGO+ Institute, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. lilian.hoonhout@vumc.nl
Martine C de Bruijne
Cordula Wagner
Henk Asscheman
Gerrit van der Wal
Maurits W van Tulder
EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research · NLAmsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedication-related adverse events (MRAEs) form a large proportion of all adverse events in hospitalized patients and are associated with considerable preventable harm. Detailed information on harm related to drugs administered during hospitalization is scarce. Knowledge of the nature and preventability of MRAEs is needed to prioritize and improve medication-related patient safety.

objectiveTo provide information on the nature, consequences and preventability of MRAEs occurring during hospitalization in the Netherlands. STUDY

designAnalysis of MRAEs identified in a retrospective chart review of patients hospitalized during 2004.

methodsThe records of 7889 patients admitted to 21 hospitals in 2004 were reviewed by trained nurses and physicians using a three-stage process. For each hospital, patient records of 200 discharged and 200 deceased patients were randomly selected and reviewed. For each patient record, characteristics of the patient and the admission were collected. After identification of an MRAE the physician reviewers determined the type, severity, preventability, drug category and excess length of stay associated with the MRAE. Data on additional interventions or procedures related to MRAEs were obtained by linking our data to the national hospital registration database. The excess length of stay and the additional medical procedures were multiplied by unit costs to estimate the total excess direct medical costs associated with the MRAE.

resultsIn total, 148 MRAEs occurred in 140 hospital admissions. The incidence of MRAEs was 0.9% (95% CI 0.7, 1.2) and the incidence of preventable MRAEs was 0.2% (95% CI 0.1, 0.4) per hospital admission. The majority of non-preventable MRAEs were adverse drug reactions caused by cancer chemotherapy. Preventable MRAEs were most often found in relation to anticoagulant treatment administered in combination with NSAIDs. Both non-preventable and preventable MRAEs resulted in considerable excess length of hospital stay and costs. On average, MRAEs resulted in an excess length of stay of 6.2 days (95% CI 3.6, 8.8) and average additional costs of &U20AC;2507 (95% CI 1520, 3773).

conclusionsThis study was the first to provide detailed information on MRAEs during hospital admissions in the Netherlands, which were associated with both considerable patient harm and additional medical costs. To increase patient safety, interventions need to be developed that reduce the burden of MRAEs. These interventions should target the areas with the highest risk of MRAEs, notably antibacterials, cancer treatment, anticoagulant treatment and drug therapy in elderly patients.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsAdolescentAdultAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolDatabases, FactualFemaleHospital CostsHospitalsHumansInfantLength of StayMalePharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID20812770
OpenAlexW2166536016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.