Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20811892›Full record

ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2011

The surgical importance of an axillary arch in sentinel node biopsy.

P F Ridgway, A M Collins, D R McCready

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Axillary arch may affect axillary lymphadenectomy.Breast care (Basel, Switzerland) · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

P F RidgwayDepartment of Surgery, Trinity College Dublin at the Adelaide and Meath Hospital, Tallaght, Dublin 24, Ireland. ridgwayp@tcd.ie
A M Collins
D R McCready

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWhen Carl Langer described the aberrant axillary arch in 1846 its relevance in sentinel node biopsy (SNB) surgery could not have been contemplated. The authors define an incidence and elucidate relevance of the arch in SNB of the axilla.

methodsA review of a database for breast and melanoma axillary SNB was carried out. The sample was 1 year at Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto.

resultsOf 319 axillary SNB, 3 (0.9%) had axillary arches noted. Two were in the melanoma group (n = 59) and one in the breast (n = 260). Interestingly one arch case had an ipsilateral 'idiopathic' axillary vein thrombosis as a child.

conclusionsThe authors see no reason to deviate from the practice of division of the arch at the highest level when recognised at SNB. This would abrogate the risk of concealed nodes and possible future neurovascular compression.

Indexed as

Sentinel Lymph Node BiopsyAdultAxillaBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRadionuclide ImagingRadiopharmaceuticalsTechnetium Tc 99m Sulfur ColloidRadiopharmaceuticalsTechnetium Tc 99m Sulfur Colloid

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.