ArticleHNO2010
[Molecular biological aspects of neuroplasticity: approaches for treating tinnitus and hearing disorders].
Article in HNO, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Attenuation of noise-induced hyperactivity in the dorsal cochlear nucleus by pre-treatment with MK-801.Brain research · 2018Article
- In Patients Undergoing Cochlear Implantation, Psychological Burden Affects Tinnitus and the Overall Outcome of Auditory Rehabilitation.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2017Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peripheral and central structures are involved in the onset of tinnitus. Neuronal plasticity is of special importance for the occurrence of central tinnitus and its persistent form. Neuronal plasticity is the ability of the brain to adapt its own structure (synapses, nerve cells, or even whole areas of the brain) and its organization to modified biological requirements. Neuroplasticity is an ongoing dynamic process. Generally speaking, there are two types of plasticity: synaptic and cortical. Cortical plasticity involves activity-dependent changes in size, connectivity, or in the activation pattern of cortical networks. Synaptic plasticity refers to the activity-dependent change in the strength of synaptic transmission and can affect both the morphology and physiology of the synapse. The stimulation of afferent fibers leads to long-lasting changes in synaptic transmission. This phenomenon is called long-term potentiation (LTP) or long-term depression (LTD). From the perspective of molecular biology, synaptic plasticity is of particular importance for the development of tinnitus and its persistence. Ultimately, the damage to the hair cells, auditory nerve, and excitotoxicity results in an imbalance between LTP and LTD and thus in changes of synaptic plasticity. After excessive acoustic stimulation, LTP can be induced by the increase of afferent inputs, whereas decreased afferent inputs generate LTD. The imbalance between LTP and LTD leads to changes in gene expression and involves changes in neurotransmission, in the expression of the receptors, ion channels, regulatory enzymes, and in direct changes on the synapses. This causes an increase of activity on the cellular level. As a result, the imbalance can lead to hyperactivity in the dorsal cochlear nucleus, inferior colliculus, and in the auditory cortex and, later on, to changes in cortical plasticity leading to tinnitus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.