Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20811637›Full record

ArticlePloS one2010

Rapid identification of genetic modifications in Bacillus anthracis using whole genome draft sequences generated by 454 pyrosequencing.

Peter E Chen, Kristin M Willner, Amy Butani, Shakia Dorsey, Matroner George, Andrew Stewart, Shannon M Lentz, Christopher E Cook, Arya Akmal, Lance B Price and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Molecular methods for pathogen and microbial community detection and characterization: current and potential application in diagnostic microbiology.Infection, genetics and evolution : journal of molecular epidemiology and evolutionary genetics in infectious diseases · 2012
    Review
  10. Genome-wide recombination drives diversification of epidemic strains of Acinetobacter baumannii.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2011
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Peter E ChenNaval Medical Research Center, Biological Defense Research Directorate, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.
Kristin M Willner
Amy Butani
Shakia Dorsey
Matroner George
Andrew Stewart
Shannon M Lentz
Christopher E Cook
Arya Akmal
Lance B Price
Paul S Keim
Alfred Mateczun
Trupti N Brahmbhatt
Kimberly A Bishop-Lilly
Michael E Zwick
Timothy D Read
Shanmuga Sozhamannan

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe anthrax letter attacks of 2001 highlighted the need for rapid identification of biothreat agents not only for epidemiological surveillance of the intentional outbreak but also for implementing appropriate countermeasures, such as antibiotic treatment, in a timely manner to prevent further casualties. It is clear from the 2001 cases that survival may be markedly improved by administration of antimicrobial therapy during the early symptomatic phase of the illness; i.e., within 3 days of appearance of symptoms. Microbiological detection methods are feasible only for organisms that can be cultured in vitro and cannot detect all genetic modifications with the exception of antibiotic resistance. Currently available immuno or nucleic acid-based rapid detection assays utilize known, organism-specific proteins or genomic DNA signatures respectively. Hence, these assays lack the ability to detect novel natural variations or intentional genetic modifications that circumvent the targets of the detection assays or in the case of a biological attack using an antibiotic resistant or virulence enhanced Bacillus anthracis, to advise on therapeutic treatments. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsWe show here that the Roche 454-based pyrosequencing can generate whole genome draft sequences of deep and broad enough coverage of a bacterial genome in less than 24 hours. Furthermore, using the unfinished draft sequences, we demonstrate that unbiased identification of known as well as heretofore-unreported genetic modifications that include indels and single nucleotide polymorphisms conferring antibiotic and phage resistances is feasible within the next 12 hours. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Second generation sequencing technologies have paved the way for sequence-based rapid identification of both known and previously undocumented genetic modifications in cultured, conventional and newly emerging biothreat agents. Our findings have significant implications in the context of whole genome sequencing-based routine clinical diagnostics as well as epidemiological surveillance of natural disease outbreaks caused by bacterial and viral agents.

Indexed as

Bacillus anthracisBacteriophagesCiprofloxacinComputational BiologyDrug Resistance, BacterialErythromycinGenome, BacterialLaboratoriesMutationSequence Analysis, DNATime FactorsCiprofloxacinErythromycin

Identifiers

PMID20811637
PMCPMC2928293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.