Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20811617›Full record

ArticleJournal of nucleic acids2010

Cellular responses to Cisplatin-induced DNA damage.

Alakananda Basu, Soumya Krishnamurthy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nucleic acids, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 289 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
289citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

289 citing papers in PubMed, 558 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Analytical choices drive toxicogenomic potency estimates: a systematic evaluation of transcriptomic points of departure.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2026
    Article
  4. GSK3βGut · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Oxeiptosis - potential in cancer treatment?Expert reviews in molecular medicine · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

229 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alakananda BasuDepartment of Molecular Biology & Immunology, University of North Texas Health Science Center and Institute for Cancer Research, 3500 Camp Bowie Boulevard, Fort Worth, TX 76107, USA.
Soumya Krishnamurthy
University of North Texas Health Science Center · US

Funding

TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR ALPHA SIGNALING IN BREAST CANCERR01CA071727 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BASU, ALAKANANDA · 1997 to 2009
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA071727
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cisplatin is one of the most effective anticancer agents widely used in the treatment of solid tumors. It is generally considered as a cytotoxic drug which kills cancer cells by damaging DNA and inhibiting DNA synthesis. How cells respond to cisplatin-induced DNA damage plays a critical role in deciding cisplatin sensitivity. Cisplatin-induced DNA damage activates various signaling pathways to prevent or promote cell death. This paper summarizes our current understandings regarding the mechanisms by which cisplatin induces cell death and the bases of cisplatin resistance. We have discussed various steps, including the entry of cisplatin inside cells, DNA repair, drug detoxification, DNA damage response, and regulation of cisplatin-induced apoptosis by protein kinases. An understanding of how various signaling pathways regulate cisplatin-induced cell death should aid in the development of more effective therapeutic strategies for the treatment of cancer.

Identifiers

PMID20811617
PMCPMC2929606
OpenAlexW2037288471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.